Ethnicity and the Politics of Revolution in Myanmar The Fate of the Arakan Army

Main Article Content

Nafisa Nazin Lutfa
Rafayat

Abstract

This article argues that because of the unresolved conflict between the state and ethnic groups that have existed in Myanmar since its independence, the country has been mired in a constant struggle between the majority Bamar population and ethnic minorities, which has led to the emergence of a plethora of peace processes whose efficacy is shaky at best. These tensions have endured for decades, and political elites have consistently played a significant role in raising identity issues to construct nationalism. However, nothing has been accomplished. This argument is supported by the nature of the peace process that government regimes have, at times, implemented to settle ethnic strife with the Arakan Army (AA) in Myanmar. The primary objective of this study is to examine the factors that impeded the peace process after 2011 and to identify how these influenced the behavior of the AA, especially in the wake of the latest coup in 2021. A qualitative research approach was used for this study because it congruously handled the research areas. The paper, within the framework of the British colonial strategy of "divide and rule," suggests that history has exacerbated ethnic animosity in Myanmar. Hence, political elites found it impossible to engage all ethnic groups in the nation-building effort. The nation's efforts to integrate minorities were thwarted following Aung San's death, culminating in decades of ethnic unrest. The article also considers the political atmosphere of each administration and, after the coup of 2021, the prospects for peace negotiations with the AA.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lutfa, N. N., & Rafayat Ahmed Shanto. (2024). Ethnicity and the Politics of Revolution in Myanmar: The Fate of the Arakan Army. Journal of Human Rights and Peace Studies, 10(2), 221–240. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HRPS/article/view/276349
Section
Academic Articles

References

Ahmed, I. (2009). The Rohingyas: From stateless to refugee (pp. 5-6). https://www.netipr.org/policy/downloads/20100101_FromStatelessToRefugees_ImtiazAhmed.pdf

Awng, G. S., Khine, M. A., & Aung, N. T. (2019). The deadlocking factors in Myanmar’s peace process (pp. 2-8). Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/myanmar/15639.pdf

Bhattacharyya, R. (2020, July 17). Why China's support to Myanmar's Arakan Army is bad for India. Moneycontrol. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/opinion/why-chinas-support-to-myanmars-arakan-army-is-bad-for-india-5559741.html.

Bociaga, R. (2021, November 24). Myanmar's army is fighting a multi-front war. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2021/11/myanmars-army-is-fighting-a-multi-front-war/

Brent, T. (2019, January 15). Myanmar: Why Tatmadaw attempts to 'Crush' the Arakan army will 'backfire'. Southeast Asia Globe. https://southeastasiaglobe.com/myanmar-arakan-army.

Broome, J. (2021, April 9). The Arakan dream: The search for peace in Myanmar's Rakhine State. Terrorism Monitor, 19(7), 8-11. https://jamestown.org/program/the-arakan-dream-the-search-for-peace-in-myanmars-rakhine-state-on-the-verge-of-civil-war/

Chan, K. N. (2022, July 5). Arakan Army condemns military for killing six members in Thai Myanmar border airstrike. Myanmar NOW. https://myanmar-now.org/en/news/arakan-army-condemns-military-for-killing-six-members-in-thai-myanmar-border-airstrike.

Cox, L. (2014). Movements making knowledge: A new wave of inspiration for sociology? Sociology, 48(5), 954–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038514539063

Fairbairn, G. (1956). Aspects of the Burmese political scene. Pacific Affairs, 29(3), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2753472

Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E., Loescher, G., Long, K., & Sigona, N. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of refugee and forced migration studies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199652433.001.0001

Foxeus, N. (2019). The Buddha was a devoted nationalist: Buddhist nationalism, ressentiment, and defending Buddhism in Myanmar. Religion, 49(4), 661–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2019.1610810

Furnivall, J. S. (1953). Burma, past and present. Far Eastern Survey, 22(3), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/3024126

Hein, P. (2018). The re-ethnicisation of politics in Myanmar and the making of the Rohingya ethnicity paradox. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 74(4), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928418802072

Hlaing, K. H. (2021, August 31). Arakan army seeks to build 'inclusive' administration in Rakhine State. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2021/08/arakan-army-rebels-seek-inclusive-administration-in-rakhine-state.

Kham, K. K. M. (2021, March 10). An already failing peace process betrayed in Myanmar. PRIO Blogs. https://blogs.prio.org/2021/03/an-already-failing-peace-process-betrayed-in-myanmar.

Linn, K. (2019, February 28). 'Way of rakhita': Dream or nightmare? Asia Times. https://asiatimes.com/2019/02/way-of-rakhita-dream-or-nightmare.

Lynn, K. (2021, June 10). The Arakan army, Myanmar military coup and politics of Arakan. Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/en/article/the-arakan-army-myanmar-military-coup-and-politics-of-arakan.

Manski, B. (2019). Methodological approaches to movement waves and the making of history. In B. Berberoglu, (Ed.) The Palgrave handbook of social movements, revolution, and social transformation (pp. 35-63). Springer International Publishing.

Martin, M. F. (2016). Burma holds peace conference. CRS Insight. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/IN10566.pdf

Mathieson, D. S. (2020, November 2). The Arakan army in Myanmar: Deadly conflict rises in Rakhine State. United States Institute of Peace. https://www.usip.org/publications/2020/11/arakan-army-myanmar-deadly-conflict-rises-rakhine-state.

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). The Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar are victim of genocide! ABC Journal of Advanced Research, 7(2), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.18034/abcjar.v7i2.82

Mon, Y. (2018, July 16). Controversy, progress at the Third Panglong Conference. Frontier Myanmar. https://www.frontiermyanmar.net/en/controversy-progress-at-the-third-panglong-conference.

Myanmar signs peace deal with armed rebel groups. (2015, October 15). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-34536002.

Myint, S. Y. S. & Tun, A. H. (2016, August 30). Myanmar's Suu Kyi to hold major peace summit with ethnic rebels. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/myanmar-politics-peace-idINKCN11510M.

Nyein, N. (2020, August 21). Myanmar peace conference ends with participants praising 'meaningful' principles, post-election plan. The Irrawaddy. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-peace-conference-ends-participants-praising-meaningful-principles-post-election-plan.html.

Pwint, N. L. H. (2016, April 28). MPC to be renamed 'national reconciliation and peace center'. The Irrawaddy. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/mpc-to-be-renamed-national-reconciliation-and-peace-center.html.

Silverstein, J. (1966). Burma: Ne Win's revolution considered. Asian Survey, 6(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.2307/2642104

Smith, A. D. (2003). Nationalism and modernism (p. 130). Taylor and Francis.

Smith, M. (2020). Arakan (Rakhine State): A land in conflict on Myanmar's western frontier. Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/arakan-rakhine-state-a-land-in-conflict-on-myanmars-western-frontier.

Sobey, M., & Brandon, J. (2017, October 11). The state of conflict and violence in Asia. The Asia Foundation. https://asiafoundation.org/publication/state-conflict-violence-asia.

Steinberg, D. (2008). Globalization, dissent, and orthodoxy: Burma/Myanmar and the saffron revolution. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 9(2), 51–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43133778

Steinberg, D. (2013). Burma/Myanmar: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.

Stokke, K., Vakulchuk, R., & Øverland, I. (2018). Myanmar: A political economy analysis. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/myanmar-political-economy-analysis

Sun, Y. (2014). China, the United States and the Kachin Conflict. STIMSON. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/176073/Myanmar_Issue_Brief_No_2_Jan_2014_WEB.pdf.

Taylor, R. H. (2005). Do states make nations?: The politics of identity in Myanmar Revisited. South East Asia Research, 13(3), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000005775179676

Taylor, R. H. (2007). British policy towards Myanmar and the creation of the ‘Burma Problem'. In N. Ganesan & K. Hlaing (Eds.), Myanmar: State, society and ethnicity. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, 70.

Taylor, R. H. (2009). The State in Myanmar (pp. 123-124). NUS Press.

Taylor, R. H. (2012). Myanmar: From army rule to constitutional rule? Asian Affairs, 43(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2012.682367

Trager, F. N. (1963). The failure of U Nu and the return of the armed forces in Burma. Cambridge University Press.

Walton, M. J. (2008). Ethnicity, conflict, and history in Burma: The myths of Panglong. Asian Survey, 48(6), 889–910. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2008.48.6.889

Wansai, S. (2016, April 4). Bridging conceptual differences vital to end ethnic conflict. Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/en/article/bridging-conceptual-differences-vital-to-end-ethnic-conflict.

Wilson, T. (2017, April 3). Myanmar: The legacy of Thein Sein. The Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/myanmar-legacy-thein-sein.

Zaw, H. Y. (2016, January 4). Myanmar's Suu Kyi says peace process will be government's priority. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-myanmar-politics-idUKKBN0UI0GZ20160104.