Interreligious Dialogue in Thailand and the Philippines: Overview, Trends and Trajectories
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study gives an overview on how inter-religious dialogue (IRD) is used as a tool to transform conflict and build peace in two southeast Asian contexts, the Mindanao of the Philippines and three Southernmost provinces of Thailand where ethnic conflict becomes protracted. The study employs secondary data analysis using both academic articles and reports of activity from various organizations and agencies. It finds out that in both contexts the practice and usage of IRD are shaped by both international trends on IRD and the local actors’ perceptions on conflict and their roles in conflict transformation (CT) and peace building (PB). Most actors regard IRD as a good platform for trust, relationship, and capacity building for the affected communities. In both contexts the elicitive approach in IRD is present. IRD of the Philippines seems to project more vital elicitive traits as there is a stronger and more active involvement of religious leaders and institutions in IRD. In both contexts, IRD is and will be most likely regarded as a part of conflict transformation and peacebuilding schemes by state and non-state actors alike. However, because of its rather indirect and long-term impact to conflict and violent situation, it will most likely not occupy the prime position in those schemes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The views, opinions, and pictures expressed in this journal are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the editor and the editorial board. All rights are reserved by the authors and the Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies of Mahidol University. No part of this journal may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the journal’s editor, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Non-commercial use of information in this journal must be properly referenced.
References
Aewsriwong, N. (2008, 22-23 December). Pathakatha nam [Keynote speech]. In Botkhwam wichakan: Prachum wichakan chatniyom kap phahu watthanatham [Proceedings of Conference on ‘Nationalism and Multiculturalism’], Chaing Mai, Thailand. Center for Regional Social Sciences and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiangmai University (in Thai).
Arendt. H. (1968). Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. Viking.
Ariarajah, S.W. (1991). Interfaith dialogue. In N. Lossky (Ed.). Dictionary of ecumenical movement. William B. Eardmans Publishing Company.
Baybado, P. Jr. A. (2017). Beyond colonization: The impact of history in Philippine interreligious dialogue. Journal of Interreligious Studies, 20, 38-53.
Baybado, P. Jr. A. (2018). The Tri-People Dialogue: Prospects for Peacebuilding in the Philippines. Studies in Interreligious Dialogue, 27 (1), 105-126.
Bienvenido, T. (1988). Dialogue of life and faith: Selected writings of Bishop Bienvenido S. Tudtud. Claretian Press.
Bohm. D. (1996). On dialogue. Routledge.
Bragado, E. H. (Ed.) (1995). Filipinas in dialogue: Muslim-Christian women's response to contemporary challenges. De La Salle University Press.
Brodeur, P. (1997). Guidelines for Interfaith Celebrations. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 34(4), 559-560.
Buadeang, K. (2003). Kan plianplæng satsana: Khwam sapso̜n kho̜ng kan sadæng tua ton kho̜ng khon kariang thang phak nưa kho̜ng prathet Thai [Changing one’s religion: the complexity of self-expression of the Karen in northern Thailand]. In P. Leangaramsri (Ed.). Attalak chattiphan læ khwampen chai kho̜p [Identity, ethnicity and marginalization]. Princess Maha Chakkrisirindhon Anthropological Center. (In Thai)
Capalla, F. (2004). Philippine contextual theology and interreligious dialogue. Philippiniana Sacra, 39(116), 349-364.
Carnegie Corporation of New York. (1997). Preventing deadly conflict: Final report. https://www.carnegie.org/publications/preventing-deadly-conflict-final-report/
Coronel-Ferrer, M. (2002). Philippine national unification commission: National consultation and the ‘six paths to peace. In C. Barnes (Ed.). ACCORD 13: Owning the process public participation in peacemaking. Conciliation Resources.
Fitzpatrick, B. (2008). The Mindanao Bishops-Ulama conference. In M. M. Rogers, T. Bamat & J. Ideh (Eds.). Pursuing just peace: An overview and case studies for faith-based Peacebuilders (pp. 117-132). Catholic Relief Services.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Penguin.
Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. (2010). People in dialogue, people for peace: Making steps towards conflict transformation in southern Thailand. Fong Tong Enterprise, Co. Ltd.
Gowing, P. G. (1977). Of different minds: Muslim and Christian perceptions of the Mindanao problem. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, 5(4), 243-252.
Headley, W. (2020). Interreligious dialogue as a peacebuilding tool in conflict situations. Spiritan Horizons, 15(15). https://dsc.duq.edu/spiritan-horizons/vol15/iss15/9
Hill, B., Knitter, P. & Madges, W. (1990). Faith, religion and theology: A contemporary introduction. Twenty-Third Publications.
Institute for Research and Development of Southern Border Region, Rajabat Yala University, (2018). Sansevana phue karnpattana thongthin [Dialogue for local development]. https://srdi.yru.ac.th/page/421/__%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B2%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%92%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%97%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%B4%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%99.html
Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University & Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich. (2016). Buddhism and majority-Minority coexistence. https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/127417
Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University. (2017). Report of activity Buddhism and majority-Minority coexistence 2017 [Unpublished manuscript]. Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University.
Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University. (2018). Report of activity Buddhism and majority-Minority coexistence 2018 [Unpublished manuscript]. Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University.
Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University. (2019). Report of activity Buddhism and majority-Minority coexistence 2019 [Unpublished manuscript]. Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University.
Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University. (2020). Report of activity Buddhism and majority-Minority coexistence 2020 [Unpublished manuscript]. Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University.
International Crisis Group. (2012, 11 December). Thailand: The evolving conflict in the south (Asia Report No. 241. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/thailand/thailand-evolving-conflict-south
International Crisis Group. (2022, 19 April). Sustaining the momentum in southern Thailand’s peace dialogue (Crisis Group Asia Briefing No. 172). https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/thailand/b172-sustaining-momentum-southern-thailands-peace-dialogue
Kadayifci-Orellana, S. A. (2013). Inter-religious dialogue and peacebuilding. In C. Cornille (Ed.). The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.,
King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue-KAICIID. (2021). Guide to interreligious dialogue: Bridging differences and building sustainable societies. https://www.kaiciid.org/publications-resources/guide-interreligious-dialogue
Kosult Mindanaw. (2010). Vision, voices and values: People’s platform for peace in Mindanao. The Bishop-Ulama Conference. https://fdocuments.net/document/mindanao-peace-communication-konsult-mindanawvisions-voices-values.html
Larousse, W. (2001). Walking together seeking peace: The local church of Mindanao-Sulu journeying in dialogue with the Muslim community (1965-200). Claretian Publication, Inc.
Ledesma, A. (2012). The bishops-ulama conference in the Philippines: Building peace through interreligious dialogue. Dialogue. 4(18), 221-230.
Majul, C. (1987). Muslims and Christians in the Philippines: A study in conflict and efforts at reconciliation. In K. Ellis (Ed.). The Vatican, Islam and the Middle East. Syracuse University Press.
McAmis, R. (1987). Inter-religious dialogue and the search for peace in the southern Philippines. Dansalan Quarterly. Vol. 8, No. 1-2, pp. 5-84.
Mojzes, P. (1989). The what and the how of dialogue. In M. D. Bryant & F. Flinn (Eds.). Inter-religious dialogue: Voices from a new frontier. Paragon House.
National Statistics Office of Thailand. (2019). Samnakngan sathiti phœi phon samruat saphawa thang sangkhom watthanatham læ sukkhaphap chit pi 2561 [NSOT reveals survey results on the socio-cultural aspect of life and mental well-beings of Thais in 2018]. http://www.nso.go.th/sites/2014/Pages/News/2561/N21-09-61-1.aspx (in Thai).
Networks for Peace. (2022). Lessons on interfaith and intrafaith dialogue efforts in Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and Thailand [Unpublished manuscript]. Network for Peace.
New World Encyclopedia. (2022, February 26). Inter-religious dialogue. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/p/index.php?title=Inter-religious_Dialogue&oldid=1065458.
Nilsen. M. (2012). Negotiating Thainess: Religious and national identity in Thailand’s southern conflict [Doctoral dissertation, Lund University]. Research Portal, Lund University. https://portal.research.lu.se/en/publications/negotiating-thainess-religious-and-national-identities-in-thailan
Nimanong, V. (2012). Thai Buddhists-Muslims customs in dialogue for peaceful co-existence in southern Thailand. Journal of Philosophy and Religion. 13 (1-2), 291-308.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Guidance on evaluating conflict prevention and peacebuilding activities, https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/dcdndep/39774573.pdf
Quevedo, O.C. (2014, February 23). Injustice: The root of conflict in Mindanao. MindaNews. https://www.mindanews.com/mindaviews/2014/02/archives-quevedo-on-injustice-the-root-of-conflct-in-mindanao/
Philippine Council for Islam and Democracy. (2004). Interfaith approaches to peace and development in Mindanao. Roundtable discussions, 7 September and 17 November 2004.
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2018). Philippines in figure 2018. https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/PIF%202018.pdf
Phongphit, S. (1984). The impact of interreligious encounter in Thailand. Inter-Religio, 5 (Spring), 16-21. https://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/nfile/3338
Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue. (1991). Dialogue and proclamation: Reflection and orientations on interreligious dialogue and the proclamation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/interelg/documents/ rc_pc_interelg_doc_19051991_dialogue-and-proclamatio_en.html
Religions for Peace. (2012). Religious leaders from the ASEAN region visit conflict zone in South Thailand and form an ASEAN region multi-religious network [Press release]. https://rfp.org/sites/default/files/ASEAN%20Interfaith%20Dialogue.pdf
Religions for Peace Thailand. (2017). Report of activity 2017 [Unpublished manuscript]. Religions for Peace Thailand.
Religions for Peace Thailand. (2018). Report of activity 2018. [Unpublished manuscript]. Religions for Peace Thailand.
Religions for Peace Thailand. (2019). Report of activity 2019. [Unpublished manuscript]. Religions for Peace Thailand.
Religions for Peace Thailand. (2020). Report of activity 2020. [Unpublished manuscript]. Religions for Peace Thailand.
Research Center for Peacebuilding, Mahidol University. (2011). Phab anakot jangwat chaidantai [Future scenario of the southernmost provinces]. Phu Sai Dad Publication.
Reynolds, C. (2004). National identity and its defenders: Thailand today. O.S. Printing House.
Rodil, R. B. (2010). Achieving peace and justice in Mindanao through the tri-people approach. Mindanao Horizons, 1(1), 25-46.
Ropers. N. (2004). From resolution to transformation: The role of dialogue project. In A. Austin, M. Fischer & N. Ropers (Eds). Transforming ethnopolitical conflict: The Berghof handbook (pp. 255–269). Vs Verlag Fur Sozialwissenschaften.
Ropers, N. & Anuvatudom, M. (2013). Peace processes as joint learning processes of stakeholders and insider peacebuilders: A case study on southern Thailand [Paper Presentation]. The Asia-Pacific Peace Research Association (APPRA) Conference 2013, Bangkok, Thailand. https://peaceresourcecollaborative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AnuvatudomRopers_APPRAPaper_2013.pdf
Santos, S. M. Jr. (2005). Evolution of the armed conflict on the Moro front: A background paper submitted to the Human Development Network Foundation, Inc. for the Philippine Human Development Report 2005. https://www.hdn.org.ph/wp-content/uploads/2005_PHDR/2005%20Evolution_Moro_Conflict.pdf
Saunders. H. (1999). A public peace process: Sustained dialogue to transform radical and ethnic conflict. Palgrave.
Schirch, L. & Campt, D. (2007). The little book of dialogue for difficult subject: A practical, hands-on guide. Good Books.
Sintang, S. et al (2012). Dialogue of life and its significance in inter-religious relation in Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic Thought, vol.2 (Dec), pp. 69-79
Suwannabhubbha, P. (2009). Heart to heart dialogue. Quality Art Limited Co.
Swidler, L. (n.d.). The dialogue decalogue: Ground rules for interreligious, interideological dialogue. https://www.gvsu.edu/cms4/asset/843249C9-B1E5-BD47-A25EDBC68363B726/dialoguedecalogue.pdf
Swidler, L. (1987). Toward a universal theology of religion. Orbis Books.
Swidler, L. (1983). The dialogue decalogue: Ground rules for interreligious dialogue. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 20 (1), 1-4.
Thai PBS. (2020, 20 January). 15 pi phra mo̜ranaphap 21 rup chak het khwamrunræng chaidæn tai [15 years on with 21 Buddhist monks killed in the deep south]. https://news.thaipbs.or.th/content/277126 (in Thai)
Thangaraj, M. T. (1999). The common task: A theology of Christian mission. Abingdon Press.
United Nations General Assembly. (2008). Resolution 63/22: Promotion of interreligious and intercultural dialogue, understanding and cooperation for peace (16 December 2008). A/RES/63/22. http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/UNGA/2008/62.pdf
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2013). International decade for the rapprochement of cultures (2013-2022). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/ pf0000221198
World Bank. (2018). Pathways for peace: Inclusive approach to preventing violent conflict. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/28337
World Population Review. (2022). Buddhist countries. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/buddhist-countries
Wun’Gaeo, S. (2007). Khon chai kho̜p: Chak khwamkhit su khwam ching [The marginalized groups: From thoughts to reality]. Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
Yacovone, A. (2012). Interfaith dialogues: A method to promote peace in southern Thailand. Scientia et Humanitas, Spring, 23-38.
Yunyasit, S. et al. (2015). Buddhism and majority-minority co-existence in Thailand: Summary of in-depth interviews on 26 Buddhist key actors of the center and the south [Unpublished manuscript]. Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University.