In Search of a Solution: An Independent Human Rights Team and Its Legitimacy in (West) Papua, Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses findings the of thesis research into potential challenges to the legitimacy of an independent human rights team among Papuan civil society in Indonesia. It aims to provide an answer to the question whether it is conceivable that a team of local civil society actors, appointed by the State to work independently on human rights cases, gains legitimacy among Papuan civil society. In the past, justice mechanisms to address human rights abuses in Papua have been without effect, and the current relationship between Indonesia and its Papuan community has been shaped by a history of political debate and continuous outbreaks of violence. This status quo could threaten the legitimacy of a State-appointed human rights team and compromise its stable existence. The research was based on a grounded theory approach, and identified and analysed the key indicators of legitimacy among a sample group of informed Papuan indigenous civilians. Qualitative field research was performed in May-June 2017, by conducting interviews among indigenous Papuan people and local civil society experts, substantiated with extensive documentary research.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The views, opinions, and pictures expressed in this journal are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the editor and the editorial board. All rights are reserved by the authors and the Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies of Mahidol University. No part of this journal may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the journal’s editor, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Non-commercial use of information in this journal must be properly referenced.
References
Affan, H. (2016, May 18). Janji penyelesaian 11 pelanggaran HAM di Papua. BBC Indonesia. http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/berita_indonesia/2016/05/160518_indonesia_ham_papua
Amnesty International. (2011, January 29). Papua Digest. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/files/amnesty_international_papua_digest_29-01-2011.pdf
Amnesty International. (2018, July 2). Indonesia: “Don’t bother, just let him die”: Killing with impunity in Papua. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa21/8198/2018/en/
Antara News.(2016, July 15). Indonesia hails MSG`s decision to reject ULMWP as member. https://en.antaranews.com/news/105670/indonesia-hails-msgs-decision-to-reject-ulmwp-as -member
Beetham, D. (2016). Max Weber and the legitimacy of the modern state. Analyse & Kritik, 13(1), 34–45, https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1991-0102
Bernhard, H. (2011). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches(5th ed.). AltaMira Press.
Capriati, M. (2016), Assessment report on the conflict in the West Papuan Region of Indonesia: An overview of the issues and recommendations for the UK and the international community.University of Warwick. https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/researchcentres/ierg/westpapua/assessment_report_international_version_final_pdf.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research methods: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.https://www.opendemocracy.net/jason-macleod/papuan-struggle-enters-new-phase
Human Rights Watch. (2007). Indonesia: Out of sight: Endemic abuse and impunity in Papua’s central highlands. Human Rights Watch, 19(10).
International Center for Transitional Justice & KontraS. (2011). Derailed: Transitional justice in Indonesia since the fall of Soeharto. https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Kontras-Indonesia-Derailed-Report-2011-English_0.pdf
Jakarta Globe. (2015a, June 25). Indonesia granted 'Associate Member' status of MSG, West Papua bid unsuccessful. Jakarta Globe. https://jakartaglobe.id/news/indonesia-granted-associate-member-status-msg-west-papua-bid-unsuccessful/
Jakarta Globe. (2015b, March 2). Retno rushes to scuttle melanesian recognition of Papua as 'Occupied State'. Jakarta Globe. http://jakartaglobe.id/news/indonesias-foreign-minister-melanesian-shuttle-diplomacy/
Macleod, J. (2010, July 26). Papua struggle enters new phase.Open Democracy.
Mambor, V. (2016, April 26). After meeting with Luhut, Papua governor expresses disappointment. Tabloid Jubi. http://tabloidjubi.com/eng/after-meeting-with-luhut-papua-governor-expresses-disappointment/
Mambor, V. (2016, June 27). Jubi: Free West Papua movement rally against minister Panjaitan in Canberra. West Papua Media. https://westpapuamedia.info/2016/06/27/jubi-free-west-papua-supporters-rally-against-minister-panjaitan-in- canberra/
Pratikno, P. & Kurniawan, N. I. (2010). Struggle to gain representation: Mixed politics in democratising Indonesia. PCD Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.25723
Sapiie, M. A. (2016, June 16). Papuan rights issues will be solved without deception: Luhut. The Jakarta Post. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/06/16/papuan-rights-issues-will-be -solved-without-deception-luhut.html
Savirani, A., & Tornquist, O. (Eds.). (2015). Reclaiming the state: Overcoming problems of democracy in post-Soeharto Indonesia. Penerbit Research Centre for Politics and Government.
Tempo.co.(2016, June 18). Luhut invites ambassadors to monitor human rights cases handling. Tempo.co. https://en.tempo.co/read/news/2016/06/18/055781100/Luhut-Invites-Ambassadors-to-Monitor-Human-Rights-Cases-Handling
The Alliance of Independent Journalists, National Papuan Solidarity, Tapol, The Asian Human Rights Commission, Human Rights and Peace for Papua, & West Papua Netzwerk.(2014). Human Rights in West Papua.http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/droi/dv/132_wpapua_/132_wpapua_en.pdf
The Jakarta Post. (2016, May 24). Police, military pose problem in attempt to solve Papua rights abuse cases. The Jakarta Post.https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/05/24/police-military-pose-problem-in-attempt-to-solve-papua-rights-abuse-cases-kontras.html
UPR Indonesia. (2017). National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21* at the UPR of the United Nations Human Rights Council, General Assembly, Working Group on the UPR Twenty-seventh session on 1-12 May 2017’, 20 February, A/HRC/WG.6/27/IDN/120
Utama, A. (2016, May 19). Janji luhut selesaikan kasus HAM Papua. CNN Indonesia.https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20160519114219-12 -131881/janji-luhut-selesaikan-kasus-ham-papua?
Weigand, F. (2015). Investigating the role of legitimacy in the political order of conflict-torn spaces. Security in Transition.
Widjojo, M. S. (Ed.). (2010). Papua road map: Negotiating the past, improving the present and securing the future, short version. The Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI).