The Emergence of Religious Nationalism: Facing the Challenges of Pluralism in Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the ways in which Islam has been exploited as a political tool that contributes to the awakening of a sense of religious nationalism and the rise of Islamic fundamentalism through the existence of intolerant Muslim vigilantes in Indonesia. By focusing on the exploitation of Islam as a political strategy used by the government and Islamic organizations in the three political periods: the Old Order era, the New Order regime, and the era of the reformation in 1998, this article in particular aims to address two critical questions: 1) How religion has been exploited as a form of political strategy in the three political periods of the Indonesian history, and 2) How religious freedom and tolerance are negotiated amid growing concerns about religious intolerance that affect inter and intra-religious relationships in the era of the reformation. This article embraces a critical interpretive paradigm that aligns with the literature research methodology. The aim is to deepen the insights and understanding about the ways in which religion has been exploited to benefit the conflicting parties and advance their political agendas. Such political manifestations are viewed as a threat to religious freedom and tolerance in the current Indonesian pluralistic nation.
Article Details
The views, opinions, and pictures expressed in this journal are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the editor and the editorial board. All rights are reserved by the authors and the Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies of Mahidol University. No part of this journal may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the journal’s editor, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Non-commercial use of information in this journal must be properly referenced.
References
Abusa, Z. (2008). The Rehabilitation of Jemaah Islamiyah Detainees in South East Asia: A Preliminary Assessment. In T. Bjorgo & J. Horgan (Eds.), Leaving Terrorism Behind (pp. 193-211). New York: Routledge.
Aspinall, E. (2005). The Helsinki agreement: A more promising basis for peace in Aceh? Policy studies No. 20,1-11. Washington: East-West Center.
Aspinall, & Fealy, G. (2003). Local power and politics in Indonesia:
Decentralization & democratization. Singapore: Institute of
Southeast Asian Studies.
Aspinall, & Mietzner, M. (eds.). (2010). Problems of Democratization
in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society. Singapore:
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Azra, A. Kontroversi Buku Teks (1). Republika Online Daily
Newspaper, 2015. Retrieved 09.10.2016 from: www.
republika.co.id/berita/kplom/resonansi/15/04/01/nm4izz-
kontroversi-buku-teks-1
Barton, G. (2005). Jemaah Islamiyah: Radical Islamism in Indonesia.
Singapore: Ridge Books: Singapore University Press.
Barton, K., & Levstick, L. (2004). Teaching History for the Common
Good. New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Bertrand, J. (2004). Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourchier, D., & Legge, J. (eds.). (1994). Democracy in Indonesia
s and 1990s. Australia: Aristoc Press Ltd Monash
University.
Carnegie, P. (2008). Political Islam and democratic change in
Indonesia. Journal of Asian Social Science, 4(11), 1-5.
Castenada, C. R. (2004). Teaching and learning in the diverse
classroom. New York: Routledge-Falmer.
Effendi, Bahtiar. (2003). Islam and the State in Indonesia. Singapore:
ISEAS Series on Islam.
Fachrudin, A.A. Persisting problems from the Al-Maida 51 debate.
The Jakarta Post daily newspaper, 18 October 2016.
Retrieved 11.04.2017 from http://www.thejakartapost.com/
academia/2016/10/18/persisting-problems-from-the-al-
maidah-51-debate.html
Fealy, G., & White, S. (eds.). (2008). Expressing Islam: Religious Life
and Politics in Indonesia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast
Asian Studies.
Fetherson, B., & Kelly, R. (2007). Conflict Resolution and
Transformative Pedagogy: Grounded Theory Research Project
on Learning in Higher Education. Journal of Transformative
Education, 5(3), 262-285.
Formichi, Chiara. (2012). Islam and the making of the nation:
Kartosuwiryo and political Islam in twentieth-century
Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV Press.
Garfinkel, R., & Zymelman, K. (2004). What works? Evaluating
interfaith dialogue programs (pp.2-7). Special report 123
of the United States Institute of Peace.
Hasan, N. (2006). Laskar Jihad: Islam, Militancy, and the Quest for
Identity in Post-New Order Indonesia. Studies on Southeast
Asia No. 40. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Heckman, B., Neiss, R. P., & Ficca, D. (2008). Interactive faith:
The essential interreligious community-building handbook.
Woodstock, VT: Sky Light Paths Publishing.
Hoffman, G. K. (2006). Lesson Plans for a Course in Compassionate
Listening.” In D. Rivers (Ed.), Compassionate Listening: An
Exploratory Source-book About Conflict Transformation
Compassionate Listening: An Exploratory Source-book About
Conflict Transformation (pp. 15-22). Santa Barbara, CA: The
Institute for Cooperative Communications Skills.
Jong, H. N. Jokowi wants to start’s mental revolution, The Jakarta
Post daily newspaper, 2014. Retrieved 22.12.2015 from http://
www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/05/12/jokowi-wants-
start-mental-revolution.html
Kabbani, S.M.H., & Hendriks, S.S. Jihad: a misunderstood concept
from Islam - What Jihad is and is not. The Islamic Supreme
Council of America. Retrieved 30.04.2017 from http://
islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/legal-
rulings/5-jihad-a-misunderstood-concept-from-islam.
html?start=9
Keaten, J. A., & Soukup, C. (2009). Dialogue and religious otherness:
Toward a model of pluralistic interfaith dialogue. Journal of
International and Intercultural Communication, 2(2), 168-
Lederach, J. P. (2005). The Moral Imagination. The Art and Soul of
Building Peace. New York: Oxford University Press.
Madinier, R. (2015). Islam and politics in Indonesia. The Masyumi
party between democracy and integralism. Singapore: NUS
Press
Omer, A., & Springs, J. A. (2013). Religious nationalism: A reference
handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Parker, L. (2005). Uniform Jilbab. Inside Indonesia-a quarterly
magazine on Indonesia and its people, culture, politics,
economy and environment. July 1.
Robinson, R. J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual
versus assumed differences in construct: “Naive realism” in
inter-group perception and conflict. Journal of Personality &
Social Psychology, 68(3), 404-417.
Ropi, Ismatu. (2017). Religion and regulation in Indonesia. Singapore:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Ross, M. H. (2000). Creating the conditions for peacemaking: theories
of practice in ethnic conflict resolution. Ethnic and Racial
Studies, 23, 1002-1034.
The Indonesian Commission for Election), Indonesia. Jalan Perubahan
Untuk Indonesia Yang Berdaulat, Mandiri dan Berkepribadian.
Jakarta: KPU Indonesia, 2014. Retrieved 09.10.2016 from
kpu.go.id/koleksigambar/Visi_Misi_Jokowi-JK. pdf
Topsfield, J. Pluralism in peril: Is Indonesia’ religious tolerance
under threat? The Sydney Morning Herald, 2016. Retrieved
04.2017 from http://www.smh.com.au/world/pluralism-
in-peril-is-indonesias-religious-tolerance-under-threat-
-gth09i.html
Tropp, L., & Pettigrew, T. (2005). Relationships between inter-group
contact and prejudice among minority and majority status
groups. Psychological Science, 16(12), 951-957.
Willis, J. W. (2007). Foundation of qualitative research: interpretive
and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Veverka, F. B. (2004). Practicing faith: negotiating identity and
difference in a religiously pluralistic world. Religious
Education, 99(1), 38-55.
Yumarma, A. (1996). Unity in Diversity: A Philosophical and Ethical
Study of the Javanese Concept of Keselarasan (pp.19-24).
Rome: Editrice Pontificia Universita Gregoriana.