Community-Based Research in Thailand: From Participatory Action Research to Democratizing Knowledge and Decolonizing Methodology
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyzes the evolution of community-based research (CBR) in Thailand through a power/knowledge lens. It examines three models—community forest research (CFR), Thailand research fund–community-based research (TRF-CBR), and Thai Baan Research (TBR)—as distinct configurations of participatory research, local knowledge, and political engagement. It shows how CFR recognized local knowledge yet remained externally framed; how TRF-CBR fostered community learning while bounded by state rationalities; and how TBR enabled villagers to pursue epistemic justice. Together, the three models show how local knowledge has contested state hegemonic knowledge, as villagers seek partial autonomy from market dependency, navigate agrarian transitions shaped by broader political-economic forces, and reclaim epistemic justice through research.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alting von Geusau, L. (2000). Akha internal history: Marginalization and the ethnic alliance system. In A. Turton (Ed.). Civility and savagery: Social identity in Tai states. (pp. 122-158). Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso Press.
Assembly of the Poor’s Pak Mun Thai Baan Researchers. (2002). Mae Mun: The return of the fishfolk. Chiang Mai: Southeast Asian Rivers Network.
Baird, I. (2020). Opening the gates of the Pak Mun Dam: Fish migrations, domestic water supply, irrigation projects and politics. Water Alternatives, 13(1), 141-159.
Boonmathya, R. (1997). Contested concepts of development in rural Northeastern Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
Borras Jr., S. M. and Franco, J. C. (2012). Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(1), 34-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00339.x
Bowie, K. (1988). Peasant perspectives on the political economy of the Northern Thai Kingdom of Chiang Mai in the Nineteenth Century: Implications for the understanding of peasant political expression. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Chitakasem, M. and Turton A. (eds.) (1991) Thai constructions of knowledge. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Deekhuntod, B. (2022). “Citizen science” in a research and development program for peaceful human–elephant coexistence: A framework grounded in civic participation and community-based research. Paper submitted to Thailand Research Fund as part of the TRF-CBR evaluation project.
Ferguson, J. (1990) The anti-politics machine: “Development,” depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. (pp. 208-226). Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). London: Continuum.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ganjanapan, A. (1984). The partial commercialization of rice production in northern Thailand (1900-1981). Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Heis, A. and Vaddhanaphuti, C. (2020). Thai Baan methodology and transdisciplinarity as collaborative research practices: Common ground and divergent directions. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 13(2), 211-228.
Hirsch, P. (1987). Participation, rural development, and changing production relations in recently settled forest areas of Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, University of London.
Hirsch, P. (1988). Bounded village and the state on the Thai periphery. Paper presented at the workshop, The Village Revisited: Community and Locality in Southeast Asia, Centre for Asian Studies (CASA), Amsterdam; later published in the CASA workshop proceedings.
Hutheesing, O. K. (1990). Emerging sexual inequality among the Lisu of Northern Thailand: The Waning of women’s status. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Keyes, C. F. (1967). Isan: Regionalism in Northeastern Thailand (Interim Report Series No. 10; Data Paper No. 65). Cornell University Southeast Asia Program.
Khon Kaen University. (1987). Proceedings of the 1985 International Conference on Rapid Rural Appraisal. Khon Kaen: Rural Systems Research and Farming Systems Research Projects.
Kitiarsa, P. (2002). Thai migrant workers in Singapore: Coping strategies, class practices and identities. Doctoraldissertation, University of Washington.
Lapanun, P. (2013). Logics of desire and transnational marriage practices in a Northeastern Thai village. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lapanun, P. (2022). A program to review and synthesize methodology for community-based research in the northeastern region: A case study of the indigenous rice variety conservation and development group in Kam Maed Sub-district, Gut Chum District, Yasothon Province, Thailand. Paper submitted to Thailand Research Fund as part of the TRF-CBR evaluation project.
Li, T. M. (2007a). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Li, T. M. (2007b). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society, 36(2), 263-293.
Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London: Routledge.
Long, N. and Long, A. (eds.) (1992). Battlefields of knowledge: The interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development. London: Routledge.
Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Missingham, B. (2003). The Assembly of the Poor in Thailand: From local struggles to national protest movement. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
Moerman, M. (1968). Agricultural change and peasant choice in a Thai village. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Nartsupha, C. (1988). The “community culture” school of thought. In M. Chitakasem and A. Turton (Eds.), The construction of knowledge. (pp. 118-141). London: University of London.
Phillips, H. (1965) Thai peasant personality: The pattern of interpersonal behavior in the village of Bang Chan. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press
Pongpitch, S. (Ed.). (1986). Back to the roots: Village and self-reliance in a Thai context. Village Institution Promotion.
Potter, J. M. (1977). Thai peasant social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Prachuabmoh, C. (1980). The role of women in maintaining ethnic identity and boundaries: A case of Thai-Muslims (Malay-speaking group) in southern Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii.
Rabibhadana, A. (1975). Bangkok slum: Aspects of social organization. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Ramitanondh, S., Ganjanapan, A., and Ganjanapan, S. (1993). Report on the research on community forestry in Thailand: A path for development, Vol. 2 – Community forestry in the northern region. Bangkok: Local Development Institute.
Rigg, J. (2019). More than rural: Textures of Thailand’s agrarian transformation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Santasombat, Y. (2008). Flexible peasants: Reconceptualizing the Third World rural types. RCSD. Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University.
Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Scott, J. (1976). The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sharp, L. and Hanks, L. (1978). Bang Chan: Social history of a rural community in Thailand. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. 2nd ed. London: Zed Books.
Smuckarn, S. (1972). Peasantry and modernization: A study of the Phuan of Central Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii.
Soonthornpasuch, S. (1977). Islamic identity in Chiangmai City: A historical and structural comparison of two communities. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Tadem, E. (1986). Technocracy and the peasantry: The Philippine rice program. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Tanabe, S. (2007). Community of practice and HIV/AIDS care in Northern Thailand. In Tanabe, S. (Ed.). (2008). Imagining communities in Thailand: Ethnographic approaches. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
Turton, A. (1977). Northern Thai peasant society: A case study of rural and political structures at the village level and their twentieth century transformations. Doctoral dissertation, University of London.
Turton, A. (1987). Production, power and participation in rural Thailand: Experiences of poor farmers’ groups. (UNRISD Report No. 86.11). United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Turton, A. (1991). State poetics and civil rhetoric: An introduction to Thai constructions of knowledge. In M. Chitakasem and A. Turton (Eds.) Thai constructions of knowledge. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, pp. 1-14.
Vaddhanaphuti, C. (1984). Cultural and ideological reproduction in rural Northern Thai society. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University)
Vaddhanaphuti, C. (1988). In search of the village community in the context of conflict and change. Paper presented at the workshop, The village revisited: Community and locality in Southeast Asia, Centre for Asian Studies (CASA), Amsterdam.
Vallibhotama, S. (1971). Ban Muang Khao: The village and the wat. Master’s thesis, University of Western Australia.
Vandergeest, P. and Peluso, N. (1995). Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory and Society, 24(3), 385-426.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittayapak, C. (1994). A case study of community-based watershed management in Northern Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria, Canada.
Zawawi, I. (Ed.). (2015). Reclaiming the commons for the common good: Community, knowledge, and the commons. New York: Springer.