Harnessing Wind Power: A Socio-Technical Assemblage of Wind Energy in Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines wind power development in Thailand as a contingent socio-technical assemblage. Rather than adopting a teleological or technocentric perspective, it highlights how renewable energy prospects emerge from the entanglement of sociopolitical and material conditions. Drawing on qualitative research conducted at the edge of the Korat Highlands, the study analyzes how wind energy projects are constituted through knowledge practices, institutional reforms, and material infrastructures. These projects become investible through processes of long-term measurement, data processing, and capacity factor calculation. Such practices intersect with regulatory changes that enabled private generation under power purchase agreements, supported by feed-in tariffs and subsidies. Technological advances—particularly the deployment of IEC Class 3 turbines—have extended feasibility into low-wind contexts. Yet turbine production and installation remain materially dependent on fossil fuel and other extractive resources. By foregrounding these socio-material entanglements, this article demonstrates that wind power development emerges from the interdependence of knowledge, socio-political processes, and material elements. The intensive material and energy demand of such projects is closely tied to extractive industries, contributing to cumulative energy systems. The intertwined relationship between fossil fuels and renewables challenges deterministic narratives of energy transition framed as straightforward “substitution.”
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abram, S., Winthereik, B. R., and Yarrow, T. (2019). Current thinking—An introduction. In S. Abram, B. R. Winthereik, and T. Yarrow (Eds.), Electrifying anthropology: Exploring electrical practices and infrastructures (pp. 3-23). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Asdal, K. (2018). Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into accounting. Geoforum, 39(1), 123-132.
Boyer, D. (2014). Energopower: An introduction. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(2), 309-333. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2014.0020
Bridge, G. (2018). The map is not the territory: A sympathetic critique of energy research’s spatial turn. Energy Research & Social Science, 36(11-20).
Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., and Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331-340.
Bromley, P. S. (2016). Extraordinary interventions: Toward a framework for rapid transition and deep emission reductions in the energy space. Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 165-171.
Çalışkan, K. and Callon, M. (2009). Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369-398.
Callon, M. and Muniesa, F. (2005). Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229-1250.
Coleman, L. (2017). A moral technology: Electrification as political ritual in New Delhi. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency Ministry of Energy of Thailand. (n.d.). Manual for the development and investment in renewable energy, Volume 1: Electricity from wind power.
EPPO (Energy Policy and Planning Office) and DEDE (Department of Alternative Energy Development and Energy Efficiency). (2015). Thailand’s main energy regulatory framework: Thailand integrated energy blueprint.
Frantal, B., Pasqualetti, M. J., and Van der Horst, D, (2014). New trends and challenges for energy geographies: Introduction to the special issue. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22, 2-6.
Fressoz, J. B. (2024). More and more and more: An all-consuming history of energy. Penguin Books.
Global Witness. (2024). Fueling the future, poisoning the present: Myanmar’s rare earth boom. Retrieved from https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/transition-minerals/fuelling-the-future-poisoning-the-present-myanmarsrare-earth-boom/
Grubler, A. (1996). Time for a change: On the patterns of diffusion of innovation. Daedalus, 125(3), 19-42.
Grubler, A., Wilson, C., and Nemet, G. (2016). Apples, oranges, and consistent comparisons of the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 18-25.
Günel, G. (2022). Accumulation: Exploring the materiality of energy infrastructure. In M. H. Bruun, A. Wahlberg, R. Douglas-Jones, C. Hasse, K. Hoeyer, D. B. Kristensen, and B. R. Winthereik (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the anthropology of technology (pp. 689-702). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Johnstone, P. and Newell, P. (2018). Sustainability transitions and the state. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 72-82.
Kern F. and Rogge K. S. (2016). The pace of governed energy transitions: Agency, international dynamics and the global Paris agreement accelerating decarbonisation processes? Energy Research and Social Science 22, 13-17.
Latour, B. (2010). On the modern cult of the factish gods. Duke University Press.
Lawhon, M. and Murphy, J. T. (2011). Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 354-378.
Leach, M., Scoones, I., and Stirling, A. (2010). Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment, and social justice. Abingdon: Earthscan.
Matichon Daily. (2013, February 13). Yingluck opens Korat wind power plant. Matichon Daily.
Middleton, C. and Ketelsen, T. (2022). Pathways to a sustainable and just transformation of the Mekong Region’s electricity sector. Bangkok and Perth: Center for Social Development Studies, Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University and the Australia-Mekong Partnership for Environmental Resources and Energy System.
Mitchell, T. (2011). Carbon Democracy: Political power in the age of oil. London: Verso.
Nader, L. (1981). Barriers to thinking new about energy. Physics Today, 34(2), 99-104.
Osborne, C. (2012). Thailand’s renewable energy adder rates. Asian Power. https://asian-power.com/power-utility/commentary/thailand%25E2%2580%2599s-renewable-energy-adder-rates.
Richardson, T. and Weszkalnys, G. (2014). Introduction: Resource materialities. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(1), 5-30.
Sovacool B. K. and Geels F. W. (2016). Further reflections on the temporality of energy transitions: A response to critics. Energy Research & Social Science 22, 232-237.
Sullivan, S. (2018). Making nature investable: From legibility to leverageability in fabricating ‘nature’ as ‘natural capital.’ Science & Technology Studies, 31(3), 47-76.
The Economist. (2021). The wind-power boom set off a scramble for balsa wood in Ecuador. https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2021/01/30/the-wind-power-boom-set-off-a-scramble-for-balsa-wood-in-ecuador.
Van den Akker, J. (2018). Theppana Wind Power Project, Thailand: Pioneering private sector utility-scale wind power. Retrieved from https://www.cif.org/sites/cif_enc/files/knowledge-documents/thailand_2_pages_dtp1.pdf
Interviews
Executive (Pseudonym). (2004, February). Interview. Wind Energy Company’ s executive who provided insights on wind energy pricing structures and project financial feasibility. Nakhon Ratchasima.
Company Representative (Pseudonym). (2024, May). Interview. Wind Energy Holding Public Company Limited’ s representative who provided data on project financial returns and debt repayment. Nakhon Ratchasima.