Inclusive Metadata for a Diverse Digital Future: Designing Interoperable and Culturally-responsive GLAM Systems
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study advances metadata design in the galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (GLAM) sector by developing a unified, ethically grounded, and technically interoperable framework tailored to the ASEAN cultural heritage context. Addressing persistent challenges in metadata interoperability, the research integrates international standards—such as Dublin Core, CIDOC-CRM, PREMIS, EAD, and FOAF—with culturally-responsive innovations, including indigenous protocols, inheritor fields, and post-custodial metadata practices. A hybrid methodology was employed, combining thematic analysis of existing ASEAN GLAM metadata practices with case studies involving Indonesian colonial records and Thai multilingual archives. The ASEAN GLAM Repositories system was developed as a prototype validation platform to operationally test the proposed metadata framework, featuring modular metadata categories (core, geo spatial, technical, temporal), multilingual and script-aware display, and technologies such as OAI-PMH, JSON API integration, and blockchain-based provenance tracking. Results show the framework preserved 98 percent metadata integrity and supported 47 minority languages across six scripts while improving user engagement and institutional interoperability. Although initially developed for the ASEAN region, the framework’s modular architecture and adherence to global standards indicate strong potential for adaptation in diverse international contexts. This research contributes a scalable, culturally-inclusive solution for digital heritage management, enhancing equitable access, ethical stewardship, and long-term preservation of global cultural memory.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Baca, M. (Ed.). (2016). Introduction to metadata (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Getty Publications.
Candela, G. (2023). Towards a semantic approach in GLAM labs: The case of the Data Foundry at the National Library of Scotland. Journal of Information Science, 49(2), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231174386
Candela, G. (2025). Browsing linked open data in cultural heritage: A shareable visual configuration approach. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 18(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3707647
Candela, G., Chambers, S., and Sherratt, T. (2023). An approach to assess the quality of Jupyter projects published by GLAM institutions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(13), 1550-1564. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24835
Caplan, P. (2009). Understanding PREMIS. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress.
Caswell, M. (2021). Urgent archives: Enacting liberatory memory work. (p. 142). Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis.
Dişli, M., Osti, G., Candela, G., and Zijdeman, R. (2025). From linked open data to collections as data: A reproducible framework using federated queries. Information Technology and Libraries, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v44i4.17432
Formenton, D. and Gracioso, L. D. S. (2022). Metadata standards in web archiving technological resources for ensuring the digital preservation of archived websites. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 20, e022001. https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8666263
Guenther, R. S., Dappert, A., and Peyrard, S. (2016). An introduction to the PREMIS data dictionary for digital preservation metadata. Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners: Implementing PREMIS, 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43763-7_3
Gysel, M., Reji, S., and Aslam, M. (2025). PLVS: A documentation and exploration system for data provenance, lineage, and versioning. In 2025 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2). (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC266238.2025.11293351
Heery, R. and Patel, M. (2000). Application profiles: Mixing and matching metadata schemas. Ariadne, (25) ariadne.ac.uk.
Hendrawan, M. R., Isa, A. M., and Samsudin, A. Z. H. (2024). Metadata interoperability for cultural heritage digital repositories: A case study in Indonesian World Heritage Site memory institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(8), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i8/22226
Hoaihongthong, S. and Kwiecien, K. (2022). A metadata schema for murals in Northeastern Thailand. Journal of Mekong Societies, 18(3), 110-134.
Hyvönen, E. (2012). Publishing and using cultural heritage linked data on the semantic web. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
Isaac, A. and Haslhofer, B. (2013). Europeana linked open data—data.europeana.eu. Semantic Web, 4(3), 291-297. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-120092
Lee, Y., Seol, S., and Lee, J. (2025). Interactive information exploration framework of cultural heritage with generative AI. In 2025 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). (pp. 851-852). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct68609.2025.00222
Lim, S. and Liew, C. L. (2011). Metadata quality and interoperability of GLAM digital images. Aslib Proceedings, 63(5), 484-498. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111164978
Masenya, T. M. (2021). The use of metadata systems for the preservation of digital records in cultural heritage institutions. Journal of the South African Society of Archivists, 54, 55-70. https://doi.org/10.4314/jsasa.v54i1.5
Massari, A. and Peroni, S. (2024). HERITRACE: Tracing evolution and bridging data for streamlined curatorial work in the GLAM domain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00477. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.00477
McKemmish, S., Bone, J., Evans, J., Golding, F., Lewis, A., Rolan, G., and Wilson, J. (2020). Decolonizing recordkeeping and archival praxis in childhood out-of-home care and indigenous archival collections. Archival Science, 20(1), 21-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09321-z
Nappi, M. L., Buono, M., Chivăran, C., and Giusto, R. M. (2024). Models and tools for the digital organisation of knowledge: Accessible and adaptive narratives for cultural heritage. Heritage Science, 12(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01219-z
Park, J.-R. and Tosaka, Y. (2010). Metadata creation practices in digital repositories and collections: Schemata, selection criteria, and interoperability. Information Technology and Libraries, 29(3), 104-116. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v29i3.3136
Pasciuto, T., Albertoni, R., and Maggi, R. (2025). Metadata schemas in cataloguing the GLAM domain: An overview. Journal of Information Science, 01655515251365580. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515251365580
Pereda, J., Willcox, P., Candela, G., Sanchez, A., and Murrieta-Flores, P. (2025). Online cultural heritage as a social machine: A socio-technical approach to digital infrastructure and ecosystems. International Journal of Digital Humanities, 7(1), 39-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-025-00097-6
Phelps, T. E. (2012). An evaluation of metadata and Dublin Core use in web-based resources. Libri: International Journal of Libraries and Information Services, 62(4), 326-335. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2012-0025
Pitti, D. and Rush, M. (2017). Encoded archival description. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, 2, 1423-1432.
Pitzalis, D., Niccolucci, F., Theodoridou, M., and Doerr, M. (2010). LIDO and CRMdig from a 3D cultural heritage documentation perspective. In A. Artusi, M. Joly-Parvex, G. Lucet, A. Ribes, and D. Pitzalis (Eds.), VAST 2010: The 11th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. (pp. 87-95). Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/VAST/VAST10/087-095
Salse, M., Guallar-Delgado, J., Jornet-Benito, N., Mateo Bretos, M. P., and Silvestre-Canut, J. O. (2024). GLAM metadata in museums and university collections: A state-of-the-art (Spain and other European countries). Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73(4/5), 477-495. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2022-0133
Salse-Rovira, M., Jornet-Benito, N., Guallar, J., Mateo-Bretos, M. P., and Silvestre-Canut, J. O. (2024). Universities, heritage, and non-museum institutions: A methodological proposal for sustainable documentation. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 25(4), 603-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-023-00383-0
Siliutina, I., Tytar, O., Barbash, M., Petrenko, N., and Yepyk, L. (2024). Cultural preservation and digital heritage: Challenges and opportunities. Amazonia Investiga, 13(75), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.75.03.22
Van Berkel, N., Tag, B., Jacobsen, R. M., Russo, D., Purchase, H. C., and Buschek, D. (2024). Impact of interaction technique in interactive data visualisations: A study on lookup, comparison, and relation-seeking tasks. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 192, Article 103359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103359
Weagley, J., Gelches, E., and Park, J. R. (2010). Interoperability and metadata quality in digital video repositories: A study of Dublin Core. Journal of Library Metadata, 10(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386380903546984
Yasseri, T., Gildersleve, P., and David, L. (2022). Collective memory in the digital age. Progress in Brain Research, 274(1), 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.07.001
Zeng, M. L. and Qin, J. (2020). Metadata. American Library Association.