Constructing Tom Identities in Interaction: A Conversation Analysis of the YouTube Show, “Talk with Betty”

Main Article Content

Krongkwan Siri
Pavadee Saisuwan

Abstract

The representation of Thai toms—individuals assigned female at birth who embrace a masculine identity and are attracted to women—has been limited and often confined to stereotypes, particularly regarding masculine expression. The emergence of new media provides a fresh platform for Thai toms to share their experiences. Using conversation analysis as a framework, this article examines interactions between Thai toms on the Thai YouTube interview-based show “Talk with Betty,” with a particular focus on narratives surrounding their identity realization and coming-out practice. The findings reveal that Thai toms’ identities are heterogeneous, as demonstrated by conversational features. Coming out is constructed as an unnecessary practice. Thai toms’ identities revolve around expressions of both masculinity and femininity, which contrasts with the stereotype that they adhere exclusively to masculinity. Through interactions between the host, Betty and tom guests, they share a mutual understanding that creates solidarity amongst Thai toms.

Article Details

How to Cite
Siri, K., & Saisuwan, P. (2026). Constructing Tom Identities in Interaction: A Conversation Analysis of the YouTube Show, “Talk with Betty”. Journal of Mekong Societies, 22(1), 103–116. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mekongjournal/article/view/284402
Section
Articles

References

Baxter, J. and Wallace, K. (2009). Outside in-group and out-group identities? Constructing male solidarity and female exclusion in UK builders’ talk. Discourse & Society, 20(4), 411-429.

Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585-614.

Butler, J. (1989). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

Clancy, B. and McCarthy, M. (2014). Co-constructed turn-taking. In K. Aijmer and C. Rühlemann (Eds.). Corpus pragmatics: A handbook. (pp. 430-453). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clift, R. (2016). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coates, J. (1996). Women talk: Conversation between women friends. Oxford: Blackwell.

Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as communitybased practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461-490.

Edelsky, C. (1981). Who’s got the floor? Language in Society, 10(3), 383-421.

Ferguson, N. (1977). Simultaneous speech, interruptions and dominance. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16(4), 295-302.

Gray, M. L. (2009). Negotiating identities/queering desires: Coming out online and the remediation of the coming-out story. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 14(4), 1162-1189.

Heinz, B. (2003). “Backchannel responses as conversational strategies in bilingual speakers’ “Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1113-1142.

Jefferson, G. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. (pp. 13-23). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kitzinger, C. (2005). Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems, 52(4), 477-498.

Kositsawat, P. (2019). Identity and subjectivity construction among Thai queer schoolgirls and lesbian women. Stance, 6(2), 1-16.

Lakoff, R. (1990). Talking power: The politics of language in our lives. New York: Basic Books.

Land, V. and Kitzinger, C. (2005). Speaking as a lesbian: Correcting the heterosexist presumption. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(4), 371-416.

Livia, A. and Hall, K. (1997). Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Miedema, S. S., Browne, I., and Yount, K. M. (2022). An intersectional burden: Gender and sexual stigma against toms in Thailand. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 2-8.

Ono, T. and Thompson, S. (1996). Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse: Collaboration, overlap and syntactic dissociation. In E. Hovey and D. Scott (Eds). Computational and conversational discourse. (pp. 67-96). Berlin: Springer.

Rasmussen, M., Rofes, E., and Talburt, S. (2004). Youth and sexualities: Pleasure, subversion and insubordination in and out of schools. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rendle-Short, J. (2005). ‘I’ve got a paper-shuffler for a husband:’ Indexing sexuality on talk-back radio. Discourse and Society, 16(4), 561-578.

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.

Sinnott, M. (2004). Toms and dees: Transgender identity and female same-sex relationships in Thailand. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

Sinnott, M. (2007). In Wieringa, S., Blackwood, E., and Bhaiya, A. (Eds.). (2007). Women’s sexualities and masculinities in a globalizing Asia. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Speer, S. A. (2011). On the role of reported, third party compliments in passing as a ‘real’ woman. In S. A. Speer and E. Stokoe (Eds.). Conversation and gender. (pp. 155-182), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stivers, T., Mondada, L., and Steensig, J. (2011). Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation. (pp. 3-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sungkaman, U. (2006). Backchannel response in Mon conversation. Mon-Khmer Studies, 37, 67-85.

Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow Paperbacks.

Tannen, D. (1994), Talking from 9 to 5: How women’s and men’s conversational styles affect who gets heard, who gets credit, and what gets done at work. New York: Oxford University Press.

Valentine, G., Skelton, T., and Butler, R. (2003). Coming out and outcomes: Negotiating lesbian and gay identities with, and in, the family. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(4), 479-499.

Wang, Y. C., Griffiths, J., and Grande, G. (2018). The influence of gender identities on body image and breast health among sexual minority women in Taiwan: Implications for healthcare practices. Sex Roles, 78(3), 242-254.

Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. (2014). Conversation analysis in language and gender studies. In Ehrlich, S., Meyerhoff, M., and Holmes, J. (Eds.). The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality. (pp. 141-160), Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

Wong, Y. (2012). Islam, sexuality, and the marginal positioning of Pengkids and their girlfriends in Malaysia. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 16(4), 435-448.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zimman, L. (2009). ‘The other kind of coming out:’ Transgender people and the coming out narrative genre. Gender & Language, 3(1), 54-80.