Damming the Mekong in the Anthropocene: Solastalgia and Gender Vulnerability of Ecological Disruption in Northern Thailand

Main Article Content

Maya Dania
Maya Kóvskaya
Chaya Vaddhanaphuti
Pasoot Lasuka

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of solastalgia experienced by Mekong women in Chiang Khong district, Chiang Rai province, whose livelihoods depend on seasonal algae foraging, which is now threatened by environmental changes along the river. Solastalgia refers to the emotional distress caused by the degradation of one’s home environment. In the Anthropocene, an era defined by human-induced planetary disruption, the damming of the Mekong ruptures the multispecies kinships that have long entwined both humans and more-than-humans. Drawing on Donna Haraway’s ecofeminist posthumanism, this research reveals how the disruptions to the river’s ecosystems also sever the symbiotic entanglements that local women have co-created with algae and the river’s broader, more-than-human ecosystems. This research employs a case study approach grounded in multispecies ethnography, drawing on semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and a literature review. By focusing on the cultural, emotional, and ecological dimensions of multispecies entanglements, the study provides an examination of the broader impacts of environmental disruption in the Mekong River in the Anthropocene. The findings, grounded in the lived experiences of 15 women intimately connected to algae foraging, demonstrate that solastalgia is more than emotions; it signifies the collapse of a shared multispecies world, where the degradation of the river threatens both the river’s sustainability and the resilience of the women whose livelihoods are deeply knotted with its ecosystem. Moreover, the study reframes gender vulnerability, moving from anthropocentrism perspectives to a relational, ecological understanding in the Anthropocene. The study advocates for a reimagined environmental governance that prioritizes multispecies justice and acknowledges the interdependent well-being of humans and non-human entities.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dania, M., Kóvskaya, M., Vaddhanaphuti, C., & Lasuka, P. (2025). Damming the Mekong in the Anthropocene: Solastalgia and Gender Vulnerability of Ecological Disruption in Northern Thailand. Journal of Mekong Societies, 21(3), 1–16. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mekongjournal/article/view/282078
Section
Articles

References

Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268-281.

Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1-51.

Albrecht, G. (2005). Solastalgia: A new concept in health and identity. PAN: Philosophy Activism Nature, 3, 41-55.

Albrecht, G. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(S1), S95-S98.

Albrecht, G. (2019). Earth emotions: New words for a new world. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Albrecht, G. (2020). Surviving the Anthropocene: Solastalgia and the new era of climate grief. Cham: Springer.

Albrecht, G., Sartore, G. M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., Stain, H., Tonna, A., and Pollard, G. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(S1), S95-S98.

Åsberg, C. and Braidotti, R. (2018). A feminist companion to the posthumanities. Cham: Springer.

Bourebaba, L., Michalak, I., Baouche, M., Kucharczyk, K., and Marycz, K. (2019). Cladophora glomerata methanolic

extract promotes chondrogenic gene expression and cartilage phenotype differentiation in equine adipose-derived

mesenchymal stromal stem cells affected by metabolic syndrome. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 10(1), 392.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Chouichom, S. (2021). Readiness of entrepreneurs towards group performance development of OTOP product: A case study in northeastern Thailand. In emerging challenges to food production and security in Asia, Middle East, and Africa: Climate risks and resource scarcity (pp. 317-328). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Collins, T. and Esterling, S. (2019). Fluid personality: Indigenous rights and the Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017 in Aotearoa New Zealand. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 20, 197.

Crutzen, P. J. and Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The “Anthropocene.” Global Change Newsletter, (41), 17-18.

Cunsolo, A. and Ellis, N. R. (2018). Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 8, 275-281.

Daniel, R., Lebel, L., and Manorom, K. (Eds.). (2013). Governing the Mekong: Engaging in the politics of knowledge. Malaysia: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.

Danielson, A. (2017). Gendered impacts of climate change in Southeast Asia. Journal of Environmental Policy and Development, 8(2), 45-59.

Embke, H. S., Lynch, A. J., and Beard Jr, T. D. (2024). Supporting climate adaptation for rural Mekong River Basin communities in Thailand. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 29(7), 67.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., and Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

Eyler, B. (2021). Last days of the mighty Mekong. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Fisher, A. and Bourque, M. (2022). Nostalgia in the Anthropocene: Remembering lost places. New York: Routledge.

Galway, L. P., Beery, T., Jones-Casey, K., and Tasala, K. (2019). Mapping the solastalgia literature: A scoping review study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2662.

Grumbine, R. E. and Xu, J. (2011). Mekong hydropower development. Science, 332(6026), 178-179.

Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.

Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal. Gender and Development, 13(1), 13-24.

Kirksey, E. and Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545-576.

Kumar, V. and Mishra, N. (2023). Under the dam’s feet: An ethnographic study of water flow in India’s Narmada River basin. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(4), 715-732.

Kummu, M. and Varis, O. (2007). Sediment-related impacts due to upstream reservoir trapping in the Lower Mekong River. Geomorphology, 85(3-4), 275-293.

Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Lebel, L., Nikitina, E., Kotov, V., and Manuta, J. B. (2007). Assessing institutionalized capacities and practices to reduce the risks of flood disaster. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 23(3), 463-478.

Leach, M., Scoones, I., and Stirling, A. (2010). Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: Narratives, politics and pathways to sustainability.Global Environmental Change,20(3), 369-377.

Malm, A. and Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62-69.

Manorom, K. (2021). Local knowledge and climate change adaptation in the Lower Mekong Basin. Mekong Regional Studies, 12, 67-84.

Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper and Row.

Miyake, Y. (2023). Conflicts and negotiations among multiple stakeholders of the Sai transboundary river management between northern Thailand and eastern Myanmar. Journal of Mekong Societies, 19(1) 86-105.

Molle, F., Foran, T., and Käkönen, M. (2012). Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance. London: Earthscan.

Moser, C. O. N. (1993). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice and training. London: Routledge.

MRC Mekong River Commission). (2022). Sustainable Hydropower Development Strategy: A basin-wide strategy for a changing Mekong River Basin. Vientiane: MRC Secretariat.

Nam, S., Middleton, C., and Pritchard, J. (2015). The water-food-energy nexus in the Mekong region: Assessing development pressures and responses in Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam. Water Alternatives, 8(1), 660-683.

Nguyen Quang Dung, Le Thi Ngoc Phuc, Tran Thi Thao, and Nguyen Hoang My Lan. (2022). Encroaching sea and coastal erosion: Autonomous adaptation to climate change in a Mekong Delta community. Journal of Mekong Societies, 18(1), 1-27.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Pham, T. T., Vu, T. P., Pham, D. C., Dao, L. H. T., Nguyen, V. T., Hoang, N. V. H., Hoang, T. L., Dao, T. L. C., and Nguyen, D. T. (2019). Opportunities and challenges for mangrove management in Vietnam: Lessons learned from Thanh Hoa, Thai Binh and Quang Ninh provinces. Occasional Paper No. 197, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.

SEI (Stockholm Environment Institute). (2017). The water-energy-food nexus in the Mekong region: Challenges and opportunities for cooperation. Bangkok: SEI.

Shiva, V. (1988). Staying alive: Women, ecology, and development. London: Zed Books.

Sneddon, C. and Fox, C. (2007). Power, development, and institutional change: Participatory governance in the Lower Mekong Basin. World Development, 35(12), 2161-2181.

Soukhaphon, A., Baird, I. G., and Hogan, Z. (2021). The impacts of hydropower dams in the Mekong River Basin: A review. Water, 13(3), 1-18.

Srimaroeng, C., Ontawong, A., Saowakon, N., Vivithanaporn, P., Pongchaidecha, A., Amornlerdpison, D., and Chatsudthipong, V. (2015). Antidiabetic and renoprotective effects of Cladophora glomerata Kützing extract in experimental type 2 diabetic rats: a potential nutraceutical product for diabetic nephropathy. Journal of diabetes research, 2015(1), 320167.

Sriprakash, A. (2018). Climate justice and gender in the Mekong Basin: Exploring vulnerability and adaptation strategies. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press.

Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., and McNeill, J. R. (2011). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio, 36(8), 614-621.

Tanee, T. (2019). Gender and environmental change in Thailand’s northeastern region. Environmental Change and Gender Perspectives, 14(1), 23-37.

Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

USAID (United States Agency for International Development). (2014). Climate change impact and adaptation study for the Lower Mekong Basin: Key final results. Bangkok: USAID Southeast Asia Regional Environment Office.

Yimyam, S. (2021). Women, climate change, and vulnerability in the Lower Mekong Basin. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 19(4), 91-108.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Haywood, A., and Ellis, M. (2010). The Anthropocene: A new epoch of geological time? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 835-841.

Ziv, G., Baran, E., Nam, S., Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., and Levin, S. A. (2012). Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(15), 5609-5614.

Website

Google Earth Pro (Desktop): (7.3.6) (Build (10441)). (December 8, 2020). [Ban Had Krai, Chiang Khong district, Chiang Rai province, Thailand]. Retrieved November 8, 2025, from https://earth.google.com/web/search/Ban+Had+Krai+Village,+Chiang+Khong/@20.260557,100.40963779,343.31521764a,5273.01748916d,35y,0h,0t,0r/data=CiwiJgokCfW_MsXnBTRAEfNSHfsgBDRAGbgkRip4-VhAIcjhZTxv-FhAQgIIATIpCicKJQohMTY-1b2xDX3Q4alNCOEhrVUFjQUhGSDJOTE5BQmRSUnMxIAE6AwoBMEICCABKCAjS46WtARAB

Interviews

Participant No.1 (Pseudonym). (2023, January 15). Interview. Mainly forager. Chiang Khong, Thailand.

Participant No.2 (Pseudonym). (2023, January 15). Interview. Fisher. Chiang Khong, Thailand.

Participant No.3 (Pseudonym). (2023, January 15). Interview. Farmer. Chiang Khong, Thailand.

Participant No.6 (Pseudonym). (2023, January 15). Interview. Fisher. Chiang Khong, Thailand.

Participant No.10 (Pseudonym). (2023, January 16). Interview. Mainly forager. Chiang Khong, Thailand.

Participant No.11 (Pseudonym). (2023, January 16). Interview. Mainly forager. Chiang Khong, Thailand.

Participant No.12 (Pseudonym). (2023, January 16). Interview. Mainly forager. Chiang Khong, Thailand.

Participant No.14 (Pseudonym). (2023, January 16). Interview. Market vendor. Chiang Khong, Thailand.