An Ethical Matrix Analysis of the Thai Tapioca-chip Drying Yard Business
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The qualitative research described in this article analyzed ethical concerns in the efforts of the Thai tapioca-chip business to develop guidelines to address ethical problems and promote sustainable business practices. The conceptual tool known as the ethical matrix was employed to analyze data collected through in-depth interviews with purposively selected informants. Findings showed a map of ethical concerns of five interest groups, that is, cassava farmers, employees in tapioca-chip drying yards, communities and the environment in the neighborhood of these drying yards, customers, and tapioca-chip businesses. These concerns were categorized according to the ethical principles of well-being, autonomy and justice. Through the lens of the Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), these concerns were further classified into two groups under the layers of ethical and philanthropic responsibilities. The overview of ethical concerns in the Thai tapioca-chip business revealed a significant element toward the development of business sustainability. This was the element of corporate citizenship based on empathy that the tapioca-chip drying yards had for cassava farmers and communities.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Akbari, M. and McClelland, R. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship in sustainable supply chain: a structured literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(6), 1799-1841.
Battistuzzi, L., Recchiuto, C. T., and Garissa, A. (2021). Ethical concerns in rescue robotics: a scoping review. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(4), 863-875.
Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Biasetti, P., Florio, D., Gili, C., and de Mori, B. (2020). The ethical assessment of touch pools in aquariums by means of the ethical matrix. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 33(2), 337-353
Brom, F., de Bakker, E., Deblonde, M., and de Graaff, R. (2006). Corporate moral responsibility manual. LEI, The Hague.
Brownlee, K. (2019). Professional ethics and criminal law. Law, Ethics and Philosophy, 7, 173-189.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1-8.
Charoenrungrueang, C. and Sungsanit, M. (2019). Management’s intention to create shared value for the tapioca starch industry in Northeastern Thailand. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 14(2), 31-47.
Chourou, L., Grira, J., and Saadi, S. (2020). Does empathy matter in corporate social responsibility? Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 100776.
Cotton, M. (2009). Evaluating the ‘ethical matrix’ as a radioactive waste management deliberative decision-support tool. Environmental Values, 18(2), 153-176.
Daniel C. M. (2001) Ethics Resource Center, Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 6: 4, 65-71.
Department of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce. (2002). Guidelines to promote development of production and marketing of clean tapioca chips. Bangkok.
Ethics Resource Center. (2001). A guide to developing your organization’s code of ethics. Washington, DC.
Ethics Resource Center. (2003). Creating a workable company code of ethics: A practical guide to identifying and developing organizational standards. 2nd Edition. Washington, DC.
Falter, B. (2006). Good intentions aside. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 30(1), 92-93.
Farstad, W. (2018). Ethics in animal breeding. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 53, 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13335
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2013). Cassava: A guide to sustainable production intensification. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations
Forsberg, E. M. (2007). Pluralism, the ethical matrix, and coming to conclusions. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 20(5), 455-468.
Giorgetti, C. and Dunoff, J. L. (2019). Ex Pluribus Unum? On the form and shape of a common code of ethics in international litigation. AJIL Unbound, 113, 312-316.
Grace, P. (2018). Enhancing nurse moral agency: The leadership promise of Doctor of Nursing practice preparation. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1), 1.
Hokke, S., Hackworth, N. J., Quin, N., Bennetts, S. K., Win, H. Y., Nicholson, J. M., Zion, L., Lucke, J., Keyzer, P., and Crawford, S. B. (2018). Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review. PloS one, 13(9), e0204572.
Issarawornrawanich, P. and Wuttichindanon, S. (2018). Corporate social responsibility practices and disclosures in Thailand. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(3), 318-332.
Jensen, K. K., Forsberg, E. M., Gamborg, C., Millar, K., and Sandoe, P. (2011). Facilitating ethical reflection among scientists using the ethical matrix. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 425-445.
Kaiser, M., Millar, K., Thorstensen, E., and Tomkins, S. (2007). Developing the ethical matrix as a decision support framework: GM fish as a case study. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 20(1), 65-80.
Kantabutra, S. and Ketprapakorn, N. (2020). Toward a theory of corporate sustainability: A theoretical integration and exploration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122292.
Kraisornsuthasinee, S. and Swierczek, F. W. (2006). Interpretations of CSR in Thai companies. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22, 53-65.
Kraisornsuthasinee, S. and Swierczek, F. W. (2009). Doing well by doing good in Thailand. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(4), 550-565.
Kumsueb, B. and Jintrawet, A. (2020). Recent evaluations and applications of a cassava model in Thailand: A review. Current Applied Science and Technology, 20(1), 156-162.
Lam, M. E. and Pitcher, T. J. (2012). The ethical dimensions of fisheries. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(3), 364-373.
Lam, M. L. L. (2018). The role of empathy in sustainable development and corporate social responsibility of multinational enterprises in China. In K. T. Calıyurt and R. Said (Eds.), Sustainability and social responsibility of accountability reporting systems (pp. 125-139). Springer, Singapore.
Lee, M. T. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency: Evidence from an emerging Asian market. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 29(2), 1-16.
Mepham, B. (2000). A framework for the ethical analysis of novel foods: The ethical matrix. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 165-176.
Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., and Millar, K. (2006). Ethical matrix manual. LEI, onderdeel van Wageningen UR.
Millar, K. M., Tomkins, S. M., White, R. P., and Mepham, T. B. (2002). Consumer attitudes to the use of two dairy technologies. British Food Journal, 104(1), 31-44.
Nair, S. R. (2020). A review on ethical concerns in big data management. International Journal of Big Data Management, 1(1), 8-25.
Nash, L. L. (1981). Ethics without the sermon. Harvard Business Review 59(6), 79-90.
Nawaz, W. and Koc, M. (2019). Exploring organizational sustainability: Themes, functional areas, and best practices. Sustainability, 11(16), 4307.
Nguyen, H. T., Le, D. M. D., Ho, T. T. M., and Nguyen, P. M. (2020). Enhancing sustainability in the contemporary model of CSR: A case of fast fashion industry in developing countries. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(4), 578-591.
Peregrin, T. (2018). Revisions to the code of ethics for the nutrition and dietetics profession. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 118(9), 1764-1767.
Petcharat, N. and Zaman, M. (2019). Sustainability reporting and integrated reporting perspectives of Thai-listed companies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 17(4), 671-694.
Ruengdet, K. and Wongsurawat, W. (2015). The mechanisms of corruption in agricultural price intervention projects: Case studies from Thailand. The Social Science Journal, 52(1), 22-33.
Singvejsakul, J., Chaovanapoonphol, Y., and Limnirankul, B. (2021). Modeling the price volatility of cassava chips in Thailand: Evidence from Bayesian GARCH-X Estimates. Economies, 9(3), 132.
Sowcharoensuk, C. (2023). Industry outlook 2023-2025: Cassava industry. Bangkok: Krungsri Research.
Srisuphaolarn, P. (2013). From altruistic to strategic CSR: How social value affected CSR development–a case study of Thailand. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(1), 56-77.
Tangen, R. (2014). Balancing ethics and quality in educational research—The ethical matrix method. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 678-694.
Thai Tapioca Trade Association, Thai Tapioca Products Factory Association, Thai Tapioca Starch Association, North Eastern Tapioca Trade Association. (2022, June 4). Letter to Pitak Udomwichaiwat, Director-general of the Foreign Trade Department and Chair of Sub committee of Strategic Planning for Cassava. Bangkok: Thai Tapioca Trade Association’s Coordination Center.
Ward, S. (2020). Reconceptualizing the teaching of ethics in a global classroom. International Journal of Ethics Education, 5(1), 39-50.
Wood, G. and Rimmer, M. (2003). Codes of ethics: What are they really and what should they be?. International Journal of Value - Based Management, 16, 181-195.
Yohn, D. L. (2020). Brand authenticity, employee experience and corporate citizenship priorities in the COVID-19 era and beyond. Strategy & Leadership, 48(5), 33-39.
Websites
Department of Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce. (2018). Tapioca-chip drying yards. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from http://maps.dit.go.th/region/Report/rp_place_all.aspx?pid=22&poid=3&p=18
Department of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce. (2021). Cassava exports in 2021 with highest revenue in fourteen years. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.dft.go.th/th-th/NewsList/News-DFT/Description-News-DFT/ArticleId/21787/21787
Office of Agricultural Economics. (2021a). Cassava (2021). Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B3%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%B5%2064.pdf
Office of Agricultural Economics. (2021b). Cassava farmer households (2021). Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%A7%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B7%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%99%2064.pdf