Understanding and Critiquing the Discourse of Gender Ideology

Authors

  • Panek Seresaman Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

Gender Ideology, Transgender, Gender, Sex, Prejudice

Abstract

This article analyzes and critiques the concept of gender ideology, using Colette Colfer’s Gender Ideology as a Religion as a case study, to examine and respond to critiques that portray gender ideology as a political religion, one that allegedly rejects scientific knowledge and opposes freedom of debate on gender issues. The article first explores the philosophical foundations of transgender thought and its distinctions from feminism and queer theory. It then introduces the origins of the gender ideology discourse with relevant examples to analyze the structure of these accusations. Alongside this, it presents the perspectives of transgender advocates, primarily drawing on the philosophical framework of Talia Bettcher. Finally, it compares these critiques with Elisabeth Young-Bruehl’s concept of the ideology of desire, demonstrating how critiques framed through the discourse of gender ideology often rely on a biased structure that conflates psychological and social anxieties from other domains with transgender issues, ultimately failing to advance genuine discussions on the topic.

References

Bettcher, T. M. (2009). Trans identities and first-person authority. In L. J. Shrage (Ed.), You’ve changed: Sex reassignment and personal identity (pp. 98-120). Oxford University Press.

Bracke, S. & Paternotte, D. (2016). Unpacking the sin of gender. Religion & Gender, 6(2), 43-154.

Butler, J. (1989). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.

Butler, J. (2024). Who’s afraid of gender?. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Cadenas, K. (2018). The Trump administration wants to define gender as biological sex at birth. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/10/the-trump-administration-wants-to-define-gender-at-birth

Case, M. A. (2016). The role of the popes in the invention of complementarity and the Vatican’s anathematization of gender. Religion & Gender, 6(2), 155-172.

Colfer, C. (2023). Gender ideology as a religion: Ideology, religion, political religions, transhumanism. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://colettecolfer.substack.com/p/gender-ideology-as-a-religion

Corbett, H. (2024). Starmer ‘not in favour’ of gender ideology being taught in schools. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/labour-bridget-phillipson-kettering northamptonshire-britain-b2567771.html

de Beauvoir, S. (2011). The second sex. London, England: Vintage Classics.

Driskill, Q. (2010). Doubleweaving two-spirit critiques: Building alliances between native and queer studies. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 16(1-2), 69-92.

Evans, A. (2024). Schools told not to teach about gender identity. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://www.bbc.com/news/education-69017920

Hamlin, C. L. (2020). Gender ideology: An analysis of its disputed meanings. Sociologia & Antropologia, 10(3), 1001-1022. https://doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752020v10310

Herdt, G. (1996). Third sex, third gender: Beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history. Zone Books.

Joyce, H. (2021). Trans: when ideology meets reality. Oneworld.

Nanda, S. (1999). Neither man nor woman: The Hijras of India. Wadsworth.

Preciado, B. (2013). Testo junkie: Sex, drugs, and biopolitics in the pharmacopornographic era (B. Benderson, Trans.). Feminist Press.

Rowling, J. K. (2020). J.K. Rowling writes about her reasons for speaking out on sex and gender issues. Retrieved March 13, 2025 from https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/

Serano, J. (2007). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Seal Press.

Serano, J. (2013). Excluded: Making feminist and queer movements more inclusive. Seal Press.

Stock, K. (2021). Material girls: Why reality matters for feminism. Fleet.

Young-Bruehl, E. (1996). The anatomy of prejudices. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Seresaman , P. (2026). Understanding and Critiquing the Discourse of Gender Ideology. Journal of Letters, 55(1), 1–18. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jletters/article/view/287895

Issue

Section

Research Articles / Academic Articles