The Effects of Production-Oriented Approach on Chinese Vocational College Students’ English Speaking Ability

Main Article Content

Jue Yang
Anchalee Chayanuvat

Abstract

This study aimed to 1) explore whether Production-Oriented Approach in teaching speaking English in higher education could improve the Chinese vocational college students' speaking ability; and 2) investigate whether Chinese college students were satisfied with Production-Oriented Approach for oral English lessons. The study was conducted at a Chinese vocational college in Yunnan province, China. The quasi-experimental group of 48 students was selected by convenience sampling method. The instruments adopted in the study consisted of the Pre/Post-Test and a satisfaction questionnaire. The Pre/Post Test result revealed a significant improvement of the Chinese vocational college students' speaking ability scores in the five parts of fluency, pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary and content (P< 0.05). The questionnaire data analysis indicated that the students were satisfied with the Production-Oriented Approach in teaching and learning English speaking at the level of 'Agree' (X=3.880/SD-1.188). Thus, it is recommended the teacher should focus on developing students' speaking ability and help them improve their speaking skills and students learning strategies under the guidance of the production-oriented approach as well as the exploration of teacher-student interaction. This study provides valuable information about the impact of teaching English in higher education on improving the speaking ability of higher vocational college students as well as students' satisfaction with teaching English as a foreign language. These findings have important implications for future teaching research and practice, which will help promote the development of English teaching and improve the speaking ability of higher education college students.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yang, J., & Chayanuvat, A. . (2024). The Effects of Production-Oriented Approach on Chinese Vocational College Students’ English Speaking Ability. International Journal of Multidisciplinary in Management and Tourism, 8(1), 115–134. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijmmt/article/view/274182
Section
Research Articles

References

Adams, R.J. (2005). Reliability as a measurement design effect. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(2-3), 162-172.

Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.

Bi, Q. (2019). Comparison of “output-oriented method” and “task-based teaching method”: design and use of teaching materials. Foreign Language Teaching, 40(04), 61-65.

Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Cognitive domain. McKay.

Brown, H.D. (2002) English language teaching in the “post-method” era: Toward better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 9, 18.

Chalmers, D. (2007). A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching. Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.

Chang, S.L. (2017). A study on the preparation of teaching materials by “production-oriented approach”. Modern Foreign Language, 40(03), 359-368.

Chang, I.Y., & Chang, W.Y. (2012). The Effect of Student Learning Motivation on Learning Satisfaction. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 4(3), 281-305. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/921995037? accountid=15533

Chen, W.K. (2010). Research on the reform of writing teaching in English majors based on output-driven assumption. Journal of Henan Institute of Education (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 29(03), 120-122.

Chen, W. (2020) Research on nominalization teaching of academic English writing based on output-oriented approach: An example of enabling teaching sessions. Frontiers of Foreign Language Education Research, 3(01),15-23, 86-87.

Chien, T.K. (2007). Using the learning satisfaction improving model to enhance the teaching quality. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(12), 192 - 214.

Deng, H. (2018). Comparison of “production-oriented approach” and “task-based teaching method”. concept, assumption and process. Foreign Language Teaching, 39(03), 55-59.

Deng, T. (2019). Discussion on the mode of oral English teaching in higher vocational education based on production-oriented approach. Educational Science Forum, (30), 72-76.

Du, W., & Liu, et al. (2019). Research on the teaching practice of POA in engineering ESP courses--taking the course of “workplace English for it industry” as an example. Frontiers of Foreign Language Education Research, 2(03), 42-50.

Ellis, M., & Johnson, C. (1994). Teaching Business English: An introduction to business English for language teachers, trainers, and course organizers. OUP Oxford.

Ellis, R. (2017). The production-oriented approach: Moving forward. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 454-458.

Fang, X. (2010). Competency-based, output-driven and the construction of English specialized course clusters. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 31(03), 3-8.

Fu, H., & Li, X. (2021). Spoken English training of winter Olympics volunteers based on production-oriented approach. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 11(3), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2021.113026

Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.

Hanten, G., Li, X., & Chapman, S.B. (2007). Development of verbal selective learning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32(1), 585-596.

Iman, J. N. (2017). Debate instruction in EFL classroom: Impacts on the critical thinking and speaking skill. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1046a

Ji, W., Gui, J., & Zhu, Y. (2020) Design and implementation of input facilitation in production-oriented teaching. Language Teaching and Research, (03), 33-40.

Jia, G., Ma, Y., & Jiang, N. (1999). A psychological study of English teaching in secondary schools. Hunan Normal University Press.

Karaguven, M. (2012). The adaptation of academic motivation scale to Turkish. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 2611-2618.

Kohn, K. (2018). POA meets ELF in intercultural telecollaboration. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 244-248. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2018-0017

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S. (1984). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman.

Krashen, S. (1992). Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art. Georgetown University.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to post-method. Routledge.

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of social issues, 2(4), 34- 46.

Liang, Y.L., & Liang, Y. H. (2012). Research on the intelligent tutor system of spoken English based on voice assessment. Modern Education Technology, 22(11), 82-85.

Liu, X. R., & Zhong, M. C. (2011). Output-driven assumptions and the change of thinking habits in oral output--taking the example of oral English teaching for non-English major graduate students. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology, 6(02), 171-172.

Long, M. H. (1983a). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359-382.

Long, M. H. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input 1. Applied linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of second language acquisition. Routledge.

Matsuda, P. K. (2017). Some thoughts on the production-oriented approach. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 468-469.

Miyawaki, K. (2012). Selective learning enabled by intention to learn in sequence learning. Psychological research, 76(1), 84-96.

Prabhu, N.S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.

Polio, C. (2017). Reflections on the production-oriented approach vis-à-vis pre-service teachers. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 464-467. https://doi.org/10. 1515/cal-2017-0029

Qi, P., & Shi, X. (2016). Research on the design and effect of English audiovisual speaking program based on POA. Education Academic Monthly, (08), 106-111.

Qiu, L. (2017). Research on the process-oriented design of language facilitation in the “production-oriented approach”. Modern Foreign Languages, 40(03), 386- 396.

Qiu, L. (2019). A dialectical study of “production-oriented approach” enabling session. Modern Foreign Languages, 42(03), 407-418.

Qiu, L. (2020). An analysis of the design criteria of “production-oriented approach” facilitation. Frontiers of Foreign Language Education Research, 3(02), 12- 19-90.

Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129-150.

Richard, C.J., & Rodgers, S.T. (2001). Approach and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. Cambridge University Press.

Schaller-Schwaner, I. (2018). Reflections on the production-oriented approach (PO) in China: A new name and a new acronym. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 249-252. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2018-0018

Su, L. (2011). Listening teaching for English majors based on output-driven assumption. Educational Academic Monthly, (06), 107- 109.

Sun, S.G. (2017). Reflective practice research on “teacher student cooperation evaluation”. Modern Foreign Languages, 040(003), 397-406.

Sun, S. (2020a). An example of teacher-student cooperative evaluation principle in the “production-oriented approach”. Frontiers of Foreign Language Education Research, 3(02), 20 – 27.

Sun, S. (2020b). Optimizing teacher-student collaborative assessment in the production-oriented approach: A dialectical research. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2020-0020

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Input in second language acquisition, 15, 165-179.

Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 158-164.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G.Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. Routledge.

Tang, C.Y., & Jie, M.T. (2011). Output-driven assumptions and English interpretation teaching. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (Social Science Edition), 30(03), 75-79.

Vettorel, P. (2018). Engaging with the language-The PO approach. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 253-255. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2018-0019

Wang, J.P. (2010). Reform of business English writing program in higher vocational education from output-driven assumption. Journal of Hubei Economic College (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 7(10), 187-188.

Weerasinghe, I.S., & Fernando, R.L. (2017). Students’ satisfaction in higher education. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 533–539. https://10.12691/ education-5-5-9.

Wei, Y., & Zhang, L. (2013). The survey on barriers of oral English learning for college students in China. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 68-76.

Wen, Q. (2012). English as a lingua franca: A pedagogical perspective. Journal of English as a lingua franca, 1(2), 371-376. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2012-0024

Wen, Q. (2018). The production-oriented approach to teaching university students English in China. Language Teaching, 51(4), 526-540. https://doi.org/10.1017/S02614448160 0001X

Wen, Q. (2020). Production-oriented approach: Developing a theory of foreign language education with Chinese features. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Wen, Q., & Bi, Q. (2020). A Review of the Similarities and Differences between production-oriented approach and Task-Based Teaching Methods. Foreign Language Teaching, 41(04), 41-46.

Wen, Q. F. (1999). The teaching of English as a foreign language. Shaanxi Normal.

Wen, Q. F. (2008). Output-driven assumption and the reform of English professional skills program. Foreign Languages, (02), 2-9.

Wen, Q.F. (2013). The application of output-driven assumptions in university English teaching: Reflections and suggestions. Foreign Languages, (06), 14- 22.

Wen, Q.F. (2014). "Output-driven-input-enabling hypothesis": an attempt to build a theory of university foreign language classroom teaching. China Foreign Language Education, 7(02), 3-12.

Wen, Q.F. (2015). Constructing the theoretical system of “production-oriented approach”. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 47(04), 547-558.

Wen, Q.F. (2016). Teacher-student cooperative evaluation: a new form of evaluation created by “production-oriented approach”. Foreign Languages, (05), 37-43.

Wen, Q.F. (2017a). Chinese characteristics of “output-oriented method”. Modern Foreign Languages, 40(03), 348-358.

Wen, Q.F. (2017b). Chinese features displayed in the production-oriented approach. Modern Foreign Languages, 3(40), 348-358.

Wen, Q.F. (2020a). Column introduction: Reinterpretation of the teaching process of “production-oriented approach”. Foreign Language Education Research Frontiers, 3(02), 3.

Wen, Q.F. (2020b). Stages of development and determinants of new teaching theories by skilled foreign language teachers. Chinese Foreign Language, 17(01), 50-59.

Wen, Q.F., & Sun, S.G. (2020). An example of the elements of the “production-oriented approach” to driving scenario design. Frontiers of Foreign Language Education Research, 3(02), 4-11.

Xie, Y. (2020). The teaching practice of production-oriented approach in higher vocational English speaking classroom. Campus English, (35), 99-100.

Zhang, L.Y. (2022). Research on the application of “production-oriented approach” in English general language teaching. Foreign Language Education Research Frontiers, 3(03), 3-10, 90.

Zhang, P.Q. (2020). A study on the classroom teaching practice of “production-oriented approach” facilitating session--an example of students' multimodal oral report design. Frontiers of Foreign Language Education Research, 3(03), 11-18.

Zhang, W. (2020). Effects of the production-oriented approach on EFL learners' writing performance in China’s tertiary education. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 323-341. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2020-0021

Zhang, W.J. (2016). The practice of college English classroom teaching based on production-oriented approach. Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching, (02), 106-114.

Zhang, W.J. (2017). An experimental study on the impact of “production-oriented approach” on college English writing. Modern Foreign Language, 40(03), 377- 385, 438-439.

Zhang, Q., & Zhang, L. (2018). A new exploration of teaching Chinese traditional culture based on the production-oriented approach--a review of English tutorial on Chinese culture. Publishing Wide, (20), 89-91.

Zhao, H.M. (2018). The application of production-oriented approach in college English listening and speaking teaching. Journal of Hubei Open Vocational College, 31(24), 131-132.

Zhao, G.Q. (2002). Ruminations on the ways of teaching spoken English. Foreign Language E-learning, (01), 54-57.