Conception of Local Budgeting Performance Indicators Storage
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper devoted to the collecting, analyzing and publishing performance information in public budgeting with new information technologies applying importance. Its implementation proposed through the concept of using an interactive data warehouse on a countrywide scale with the local budgeting in Ukraine as example case. The model of data storage and using concept has relied on implementation of the local budget programs performance indicators formulated. The scientific and technical conditions of data utilizing described. Proposed model shows the scheme of performance information flows on an example of particular types of the performance indicators, the conditions for their directly beneficial uses are determined; the levels of qualitative and quantitative data composition for the information system were specified. In support of the data storage model conception implementation authors systematized the benefits of budget entity’s performance information publicity and its exploit for the further enhance performance information analysis in the multicriteria-based decision-making.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ammons, D. N., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2008). Factors influencing the use of performance data to im-prove municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina benchmarking project. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 304-318.
Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public administration, 84(3), 517-538.
Bouckaert, G., Halligan, J. Comparing performance across public sectors. In Perfor-mance Information in the Public Sector. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 72-93 (2008).
Chadwick, A., May, C. (2003). Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Inter-net: e‐Government in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271-300.
Cowper, J., Samuels, M. (1997). Performance benchmarking in the public sector: The United Kingdom experience. Benchmarking, Evaluation and Strategic Management in the Public Sector, 11-32.
Desouza, K. C., & Jacob, B. (2017). Big data in the public sector: Lessons for practitioners and scholars. Administration & Society, 49(7), 1043-1064.
Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., Rubecksen, K. (2008). Performance information and performance steering: integrated system or loose coupling? In Performance information in the public sector. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, R. D., Johnson, R. W., & Joyce, P. G. (2012). Public budgeting systems. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
lo Storto, C. (2014). Benchmarking website performance in the public sector: a non parametric approach. Journal of Computers, 9(3), 636-643.
Løken, E. (2007). Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Re-newable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(7), 1584-1595.
Ludwig, W. at al. (2004). ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic acids research, 32(4), 1363-1371.
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine Order dated 07.10.2017 № 992 "On Approval of the Typical List of Budget Programs and Performance Indicators for their Implemen-tation for Local Budgets in the" Education" http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0956-17
Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information?. Journal of public administration research and theory, 20(4), 849-866.
Shah, A. (Ed.). (2005). Public Expenditure Analysis. World Bank Publications.
Shah, A. (Ed.). (2007). Budgeting and budgetary institutions. World Bank Publications.
Throsby, C. D., @ Withers, G. A. (1986). Strategic bias and demand for public goods: Theory and an application to the arts. Journal of Public Economics, 31(3), 307-327.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2009). Difference-in-differences estimation, Quantile, 6, 25–47.