THAI CULTURAL VALUES REFORM FOR A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY

Main Article Content

จำเนียร จวงตระกูล

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to present a process for reforming Thai cultural values to align with democratic values. In order to propose a reform process, various literature reviews were made and “VAVRIEM Model” was developed and presented as a new reform process. The proposed reform process comprises of seven steps: (1) creating a clear vision and objective of Thai society; (2) creating awareness of vision and objective of Thai society among Thai people; (3) identifying and creating the desired core Thai cultural values that align with democratic society; (4) creating readiness for change and acceptance of the identified and created core Thai cultural values that support democratic society among Thai people; (5) implementing the identified and created core Thai cultural values that support democratic society in Thai society; (6) making follow-up and evaluation of the implementation of the identified and created core Thai cultural values that support democratic society in Thai society; and, (7) taking all necessary corrective actions. It is recommended that the proposed reform processes be implemented in order to achieve the goals outlined in this paper.

Article Details

How to Cite
จวงตระกูล จ. (2017). THAI CULTURAL VALUES REFORM FOR A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY. Journal of HR Intelligence, 12(2), 96–119. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hri/article/view/213905
Section
Academic Articles

References

จำเนียร จวงตระกูล. (2553ก). การบริหารทรัพยากรมนุษย์เชิงยุทธศาสตร์ : ทฤษฎีและการปฏิบัติ. กรุงเทพมหานคร : บริษัท
ศูนย์กฎหมายธุรกิจอินเตอร์เนชั่นแนล จำกัด.

จำเนียร จวงตระกูล. (2553ข). การวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพ : เครื่องมือสร้างองค์ความรู้เพื่อการพัฒนาประเทศ. กรุงเทพมหานคร : บริษัท
ศูนย์กฎหมายธุรกิจอินเตอร์เนชั่นแนล จำกัด.

จำเนียร จวงตระกูล. (2553ค). การพัฒนาทรัพยากรมนุษย์ : ทฤษฎีและการปฏิบัติ. กรุงเทพมหานคร : บริษัท ศูนย์กฎหมาย
ธุรกิจอินเตอร์เนชั่นแนล จำกัด.

บัวสี่เหล่า. Online available at : https://phatpark.wordpress.com: retrieved 22 October 2017.

ราชบัณฑิตสถาน. (2546). พจนานุกรมฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสถาน พ.ศ. 2542. กรุงเทพมหานคร : บริษัท นานมีบุ๊คส์พับลิเคชั่นส์จำกัด.

สถาบันพระปกเกล้า. ค่านิยม 12 ประการตามนโยบายของคณะรักษาความสงบแห่งชาติ. Online available at: http://www.
wiki.kpi.ac.th: retrieved 21 October 2017.

สถาบันพระปกเกล้า. ประกาศของคณะราษฎร์. Online available at : https://wiki.kpi.ac.th: retrieved 22 October 2017.

Armstrong, M. (2010). Armstrong's Essential Human Resource Management Practice : A Guide to People Management.
London : Kogan Page.

Carlopio, J., & Andrewartha, G. (2008). Developing Management Skills : A Comprehensive Guide For Leaders
(4 ed.). Frenchs Forest NSW : Pearson Education Australia.

Carr, 2016. Democracy: Who invented democracy?. Online available at : http://www.quart.us : retrieved 21 October
2017.

Change management model-Lewin. Online available at: https:// www.pinterest.com : retrieved 22 October 2017.

Chivers, 2017. From Magna Carta to universal suffrage, the 1000-year history of British democracy. Online available
at : http://www.telegraph.co.uk : retrieved 21 October 2017.

Congruence Model. Online available at : https://leg4.wikispaces.com/Congruence+Model : retrieved 23 October
2017.

Core Democratic Values Defined. Online available at : https://www.learningtogive.org : retrieved 21 October 2017.

Core Democratic Values List. Online available at : https://1.cdn.edl.io: retrieved 21 October 2017.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4 ed.). Los
Angeles : SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks :
Sage.

Democratic Values - Liberty, Equality, Justice. Online available at : http://www.ushistory.org/gov/ld.asp: retrieved
21 October 2017.

8 Steps to Change Management. Online available at : https:// www.pinterest.com: retrieved 22 October 2017.

Hiatt, J. M. (2006). ADKAR : A Model for Change in Business, Government and Our Community Loveland, Colorado :
Prosci Research.

Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's Consequences : International Differences in Work-Related Values. London : Sage.

Joungtrakul, J. (2009). Industrial Democracy and Best Practice in Thailand. Saarbrucken, Germany : LAP Lambert
Academic Publishing AG & Co. KG.

Joungtrakul, J. (2016). Making Change Last : Is It an Impossible Task in Thailand. AFBE Journal, 9 (1), 34-52.

Joungtrakul, J., & Teparagul, O. (2012). Social dialogue in Thailand. In C. Perryer & D. Plowman (Eds.), Business
Development in Asia (pp.149-156). Broadway, Western Australia : Juniper Press Asia.

Komin, S. (1990). The Psychology of the Thai People : Values and Behevioral Patterns. Bangkok : National Institute
of Development Administration (NIDA), Research Center.

Kotter, J. (2016). The 8-Step Process for Leading Change. Retrieved 31 May 2916, from Kotter International.

Kotter, J. P. (2002). The Heart of Change : Real-life Stories of How People Change their Organizations. Boston,
Mass : Harvard Business School Press.

Kotter, J. P. (2007). Leading Change : Why Transformation Efforts Fail. January 2007 (Best of HBR), 1-11. Retrieved
from Harvard Business Review. website : www.hbrreprints.org

Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Boston, Mass : Harvard Business Review Press.

Kreitner, R. (2007). Management (10 ed.). Boston, MA. : Houghton Mifflin Company.

Lewin, K. (2000 orig. 1951). The Field Approach : Culture and Group Life as Quasi-Stationary Processes. In W. L.
French, C. H. Bell & R. A. Zawacki (Eds.), Organization Development and Transformation : Managing Effective
Change (5th ed., pp.115). Boston : Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Magna Carta-British History. Online available at : http://www.history.com : retrieved 21 October 2017.

Mercer Delta Consulting LLC, (2003). The Congruence Model : A Roadmap for Understanding Organizational
Performance. Online available at : https://ldt.stanford.edu/-gwarman/Files/Congruence_Model.pdf : retrieved
23 October 2017.

Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1980). Frameworks for Organizational Behavior - A model for diagnoseing
organizational behvior : Applying a congruence perspective. AMA-COM, https:///pdf.hs.colu,bia.edu/
Congruence-Model.pdf : retrieved 23 October 2017.

Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1989). Organizational Frame Bending : Principles for Managing Reorientation. The
Academy of Management EXECUTIVE, 3 (3), 194-204.

Peters, T.J., & Waterman, R.H. (1982). In Search of Excellence : Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies.
New York : Harper & Row, Publishers.

Prosci ADKAR Model. Online available at : https://www.pinterest.com : retrieved 22 October 2017.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3 ed.). New York : The Free Press.

Runyon, K. E. (1977). Consumer Behaviour and the Practice of Marketing. Columbus, Ohio : Charles E. Merrill.

Swanson, R. A., & Holton III, E. F. (2001). Foundations of Human Resource Development. San Francisco : Berrett-Koehler.

Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the Waves of Culture : Understanding Cultural Diversity in
Global Business (2nd ed.). New York : McGraw-Hill.

What is the ADKAR Model?. Online available at : https://www.prosci.com/adkar/adkar-model : retrieved 22
October 2017.