A Study on the Discourse Regarding the Handover and Continuation of Power of the Ruling Class Under the Succession System in Ancient Chinese Patriarchal Society in the Chinese Novel “Romance of the Three Kingdoms”
Keywords:
Romance of the Three Kingdoms, discourse, ruling class, succession system, patriarchal societyAbstract
This article aims to study and analyze the discourse regarding the handover and continuation of power of the ruling class under the succession system in the patriarchal society during the Late Han Dynasty in the Chinese novel “Romance of the Three Kingdoms” by using a critical discourse analysis approach, to study the language strategies used in the construction of discourse about class, and to analyze the ideology reflected through this discourse. The study found that on the issue of handing over and continuing the power of the ruling class, the novel “Romance of the Three Kingdoms” reproduces the construction of class discourse in the context of hierarchical relationships between king and vassal and between father and son under the zongfa system in ancient Chinese patriarchal society with Confucianism as its state ideology. This can be separated into two types: succession through usurpation of the throne, and lineage succession under the zongfa system. It was also found that word choice, reference, storytelling, analogy, hyperbole, and other factors are among the language strategies used in the construction of this discourse.
References
Chairat Charoensin-o-larn ไชยรัตน์ เจริญสินโอฬาร. (2000). Wathakam kan phatthana: Amnat khwamru khwamching ekkalak lae khwam pen uen วาทกรรมการพัฒนา: อำนาจ ความรู้ ความจริง เอกลักษณ์และความเป็นอื่น [Development discourses: Power, knowledge, truth, identity, and otherness]. Wiphasa.
Damrong Rajanubhab, Somdet Kromphraya ดำรงราชานุภาพ, สมเด็จกรมพระยา. (1928). Tamnan rueang Samkok ตำนานเรื่องสามก๊ก [The legend of the book Samkok.]. Rongphim Sophon Phiphattanakon.
Prapin Manomaivibool ประพิณ มโนมัยวิบูลย์. (1966). Samkok: Kan sueksa priapthiap สามก๊ก: การศึกษาเปรียบเทียบ [San Kuo: A comparative study] [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. CUIR. https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/23198
Suradech Chotiudompant สุรเดช โชติอุดมพันธ์. (2017). Thrisadi wannakhadi wichan tawantok nai khrissatawat thi 20 ทฤษฎีวรรณคดีวิจารณ์ตะวันตกในคริสต์ศตวรรษที่ 20 [Literary criticism theories in the 20th century in the Western world] (2nd ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press.
Suree Choonharuangdej สุรีย์ ชุณหเรืองเดช. (2008). Sathanaphap yingchai nai khropkhrua Chin: Mum sathon chak phasit samnuan lae khamphangphoei Chin สถานภาพหญิงชายในครอบครัวจีน: มุมสะท้อนจากภาษิต สำนวน และคำพังเพยจีน [Status of men and women in Chinese families: Reflections from Chinese proverbs, expressions, and aphorisms]. Warasarn aksornsat วารสารอักษรศาสตร์ [Journal of Letters], 37(1), 243-279.
Thavorn Sikkhakosol ถาวร สิกขโกศล. (1989). Mong Samkok chak phasa Chin มองสามก๊กจากภาษาจีน [A look at Samkok from the original Chinese version]. Warasarn Asia tawan-ok sueksa วารสารเอเชียตะวันออกศึกษา [Thai Journal of East Asian Studies], 2(2), 95-98.
Yosakrai S.tansakul ยศไกร ส.ตันสกุล. (2015). Kan phalit Samkok nai boribot khong sangkhom Thai phoso 2480-2550 การผลิตสามก๊กในบริบทของสังคมไทย พ.ศ. 2480-2550 [The production of “The Romance of Three Kingdoms” in Thai society, 1937-2007] [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. TU Digital Collections. https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:91756
Barker, C. (2004). The Sage dictionary of cultural studies. Sage Publications.
Cao, W. Z. (1996). Zhongguo shehui tongshi—Qin Han Wei Jin Nanbeichao 中国社会通史—秦汉魏晋南北朝 [General history of Chinese society - Qin, Han, Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern dynasties]. Shanxi jiaoyu chubanshe.
Dilokwanich, M. (1983). Samkok: A study of Thai adaptation of a Chinese novel [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle]. ResearchWorks. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/11139
Dong Han monian de dongluan daodi you duo kepa? Jing chuxian tonglei wei shi, zong renkou jujian ji qian wan 东汉末年的动乱到底有多可怕?竟出现同类为食,总人口剧减几千万 [How terrifying was the turmoil in the late Eastern Han Dynasty? There were even cannibalism phenomena, and the total population drastically decreased by tens of millions]. (2020, October 14). Baidu. Retrieved April 29, 2024, from https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1680465471263228839&wfr=spider&for=pc
Jie, G. Y. (2022, December 7). Dong Zhongshu yinyang xue pingxi 董仲舒阴阳学说评析 [Comments on Dong Zhongshu's theory of yin and yang]. Hengshui xueyuan xuebao 衡水学院学报 [Journal of Hengshui University], 6. Retrieved April 29, 2024, from https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzIyMzIyMDIzOA==&mid=2659717168&idx=3&sn=63cf70f20b6362093d048fc6cbe08c1e&chksm=f35d3751c42abe477875ec3a05f45ecddabef92082491498c6b41174a63c0ce89b5081cc560a&scene=27
Li, B. J. (1996). Ming Qing xiaoshuo bijiao yanjiu 明清小说比较研究 [A Comparative study of novels in Ming and Qing dynasties]. Sichuan University Press.
Li, X. J. (2019, May 28) Rujia hexin jiazhi guan de sixiang neihan, xitong jiegou ji qi xiandai yiyi 儒家核心价值观的思想内涵、系统结构及其现代意义 [The Ideological connotation, system structure and modern significance of the core values of Confucianism]. Kong Meng Zhi Xiang. Retrieved April 29, 2024, from https://m.kmzx.org/wenhua/rujia/41365.html
Li, Z. A. & Sun, L. Q. (1998). Zhonghua wenhua tongzhi--Shehui jieceng zhidu zhi 中华文化通志·社会阶层制度志 [General history of Chinese culture--History of social class system]. Shanghai renmin chubanshe.
Liu, S. D. (Ed.). (2011). Sanguo yanyi 三国演义 [Romance of the Three Kingdoms]. Beijing zhonghua shuji.
Shen, B. J. (2000). 1999 nian Sanguo yanyi yanjiu zongshu 1999年三国演义研究综述 [A review of the research on Romance of the Three Kingdoms in 1999]. Hubei daxue xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban) 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版) [Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Science)], 27(4), 108-110.
Wang, L. & Wang, H. D. (2003). Jinnian Sanguo yanyi yanjiu zongshu 近年三国演义研究综述 [A Review of the research on Romance of the Three Kingdoms in recent years]. Jinzhou Normal University.
Wang, W. [Wen]. (2019). Duizhao Sanguo zhi he Sanguo yanyi kan jicheng zhidu dui Sanguo shiqi de zhengzhi geju de bianhua 对照《三国志》和《三国演义》看继承制度对三国时期的政治格局的变化 [Comparing the Records of the Three Kingdoms and the Romance of the Three Kingdoms to observe the changes in the political landscape of the Three Kingdoms period due to the Inheritance system]. Zhishi - liliang 知识-力量 [Knowledge Power], 1. Retrieved April 29, 2024, from https://www.qikanchina.com/thesis/detail/2800946
Wang, W. [Wei]. (2019, September 10). Dong Han ziran zaihai shi yanjiu zongshu 东汉自然灾害史研究综述 [A review of the research on the history of natural disasters in the Eastern Han Dynasty]. Nongye zaihai yanjiu 农业灾害研究 [Agricultural Disaster Research], 2. Retrieved April 29, 2024, from https://www.fx361.com/page/2019/0910/10028527.shtml
Wei, Q. Y. (1989). Zhongguo zhengzhi zhidu shi 中国政治制度史 [History of China's political system]. Renmin daxue chubanshe.
Yi, Z. X. (1987). Hu Shi lun zhongguo gudian xiaoshuo 胡适论中国古典小说 [Hu Shi's Discussion on Chinese classical novels]. Changjiang wenyi chubanshe.
Yuan, X. P. (2014). Zhongguo wenxue shi 中国文学史 [History of Chinese literature]. Higher Education Press.
Zhang, X. J. (1998). Zhongguo junzhu zhuanzhi zhengti xia de huangwei di zhangzi jicheng zhi xin lun 中国君主专制政体下的皇位嫡长子继承制新论 [A New discussion on the primogeniture succession system under the monarchical autocratic regime in China]. Wuhan daxue xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban) 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版) [Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Science)], 5, 22-28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright and plagiarism
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to use copyrighted materials from copyright owners. Authors are responsible for observing requisite copyright law when quoting or reproducing copyrighted materials. Quotations and reproductions of content from other published sources must be accompanied by a reference and all sources should be clearly listed in the references section. Quotations and reproductions of content from external sources without due attribution could be considered a severe infringement of academic conduct and may constitute a legal offence under the Copyright Act of B.E. 2537. Any legal ramifications arising from the infringement of copyright regulations would be the sole responsibility of the author(s).