@article{Thongbooncho_Thamasaro (Saeou)_Yanametee (Kraithep)_Chunu_Hanthet_2022, place={Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand}, title={PUBLIC OPINIONS TOWARDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF NAKHON SI THAMMARAT MUNICIPALITY, NAKHON SI THAMMARAT PROVINCE}, volume={9}, url={https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMND/article/view/260739}, abstractNote={<p>The Objectives of this research article were to 1) to study level of public opinions towards community development of Nakhon Si Thammarat municipality<strong>, </strong>Nakhon Si Thammarat province, and 2) to comparison level of public opinions towards community development of Nakhon Si Thammarat municipality<strong>, </strong>Nakhon Si Thammarat province that classified by genders, ages, status, educational level and occupation. The qualitative research method used the questionnaires. Select purposive sampling, sample group such as: people aged 18 years and over who had house registration in Nakhon Si Thammarat municipality. Nakhon Si Thammarat Province total of 400 people. By the data analyzed with statistics frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and t-test, F-test, summarized the overview in a tabular form for the essay. The research was found that: 1. study level of public opinions towards community development of Nakhon Si Thammarat municipality<strong>, </strong>Nakhon Si Thammarat province was at high level (  = 3.58, S.D.= 0.16) contain 1.1) infrastructural aspect was at high level (  = 3.73, S.D. = 0.37), 1.2) natural resource and environment aspect was at high level (  = 3.65, S.D. = 0.36), 1.3) health promotion, quality of life aspect was at high level (  = 3.59, S.D. = 0.34), 1.4) management aspect under good governance principles was at high level (  = 3.57, S.D. = 0.40), 1.5) tourism and sprot aspect was at high level (  = 3.52, S.D. = 0.40),and 1.6) education, religious, cultural art , traditional and local wisdom was at medium level (  = 3.44, S.D. = 0.37). And 2. comparison level of public opinions towards community development of Nakhon Si Thammarat. Overall, there were no differences in each aspect. It was found that gender, status and occupation were different in terms of natural resources. and environment and infrastructure differed statistically at the .05 level.</p>}, number={4}, journal={Journal of MCU Nakhondhat}, author={Thongbooncho , Theerawat and Thamasaro (Saeou), PhraSaroj and Yanametee (Kraithep), PhraNattapong and Chunu, Chian and Hanthet, Sakda}, year={2022}, month={Apr.}, pages={228–244} }